Thread Rating:
Rangers v Hibs - 28/12/15
#51
(30-12-2015, 17:23)TheWorthinGer Wrote:
(30-12-2015, 16:53)supercooper Wrote: Jim were you at Queen st? and as for glory hunting there were mitigating circumstances for the drop in attendances. Christ your piss poor support didn't even back your side, In the 2nd leg off the playoffs last Season wait till Falkirk pull a few points clear of you and the desertion will start again. Perhaps if Stubbs manages to punt Cummings then it may start earlier.

Deluded bunch, SC. Tiny ground and they still rattle around in it. Out lowest attendance is generally better than their highest.

Hibs - if only they had some glory to hunt.

I guess once you convince yourself you are the same club after liquidation,then convince yourself you tricked us all into thinking you were singing sectarian songs the other day then you truly are talking to an authority on delusion.

So fair play to you.
0762 likes this post
Reply
#52
(30-12-2015, 17:31)exeterhibby Wrote: Fyvie banned for 2 games......correct decision in my opinion. Need to cut this type of shite out the game.

Rangers appealing Halliday's red card which still should not be rescinded - forget the no head butt argument, he retaliated aggressively with contact and that offence is still a straight red card. The rule is clear and there's tv footage to show that Halliday retaliated in kind - absolutely no argument! I'll scream to the heavens if he walks away from a deserved 3 match ban. I've refed matches in the past and the rule is clear when it comes to retaliation and it's irritating listening to people in pro footie occasionally trying to change this fundamental rule to suit their own motives!
Reply
#53
I agree 0762 but suspect the ref highlighted the headbutt and have a sneaky feeling they will overlook the shin kick and shoulder barge.....are they able to downgrade to a yellow?.......in which case I'm sure they will.
"FOREVER UNITED"
Reply
#54
I don't think that muppet madden was going to send halliday off until fyvies theatrics. The card shouldn't be rescinded though,but it probably will be.
Reply
#55
That offence is not a yellow card offence exeterhibby - it's still retaliation and a straight red card and somehow people in pro footie seem to wanna obscure the facts! I hope the beaks just read the rule book, study the tv footage and apply the punishment to the aggressive player.
Reply
#56
Aye 0762 the kick out was no different to Beckhams in the World Cup but lets wait and see.......I have a feeling....   Doh
"FOREVER UNITED"
Reply
#57
(30-12-2015, 18:13)0762 Wrote: That offence is not a yellow card offence exeterhibby - it's still retaliation and a straight red card and somehow people in pro footie seem to wanna obscure the facts! I hope the beaks just read the rule book, study the tv footage and apply the punishment to the aggressive player.

Halliday should be done for the boot out.End of story.
likes this post
Reply
#58
Yep! I absolutely agree. If he gets away with this offence, I certainly intend to send a letter of complaint to the SFA re a massive error of judgement. We'll see how it goes - IMO it's an easy judgement on clear retaliation at any level of footie!
Reply
#59
Fyvie given two match been for being a cheat
Reply
#60
As we have already said Fred.....correct decision    Wink

reminds me I'm going fishing tomorrow.
"FOREVER UNITED"
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)