Thread Rating:
Match Thread - Watford
#81
How is Watford's defence recently? Think they let goals in at the beginning of the season but were outscoring teams. Hopefully them coming up against the best (form) defence in the league we could get a result from this
Removed until we're actually on our way back  Doh
Reply
#82
(16-10-2014, 15:58)Owlkev71 Wrote: Everyone is available apart from Lavery & Zayette according to SG.

...but SG lies!!!!!

At least he has for about the last half dozen matches.
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
Reply
#83
Makes for a good game on paper doesn't it, especially if we have a close to fully fit squad. They do have some very adept finishers so L & L will be busy at CB.

Question is who starts on the wing out of, Maghoma, Helan, Drenthe, Hope ?

No Zayatte so Imre will be happy Wink
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius
Reply
#84
Maghoma and Helan if we're going 442.

I'd possibly go 433: Semedo, hutch and lee in midfield. Maghoma, Nuhiu and May front 3
Statesideowl likes this post
Removed until we're actually on our way back  Doh
Reply
#85
I would give Madine, Drenthe, Helan & Hutch a starting role. We all know he will go 442 Thumb down , we are so predictable to play against at home, so I expect Watford to play 3 central midfielders, like everybody else seem to do at Hillsborough. We got tonked 1-4 last season and we were very poor defensively that day, should be much tighter tomorrow though.
Statesideowl likes this post
Nothing great will ever be achieved without great men, and men are great only if they are determined to be so. For glory gives herself only to those who have always dreamed of her.
Reply
#86
I can see the reasoning behind Madine. Maybe give him and Nuhiu a half each like at Leeds. Don't think I'd change both wingers though so I'd stick with Maghoma and bring in Helan
Removed until we're actually on our way back  Doh
Reply
#87
(16-10-2014, 17:16)Owlkev71 Wrote: I would give Madine, Drenthe, Helan & Hutch a starting role. We all know he will go 442 Thumb down , we are so predictable to play against at home, so I expect Watford to play 3 central midfielders, like everybody else seem to do at Hillsborough. We got tonked 1-4 last season and we were very poor defensively that day, should be much tighter tomorrow though.

I can't see SG making that many changes especially after everyone should be fresh after the break. Obviously Maguire being out is forced on him and I wonder if he will replace him with Maguire and put Palmer out on the right side of midfield, with Buxton at RB. That would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for Drenthe and Hope but as we don't own them anyway I am not too bothered about that!!
Reply
#88
(16-10-2014, 19:56)St Charles Owl Wrote:
(16-10-2014, 17:16)Owlkev71 Wrote: I would give Madine, Drenthe, Helan & Hutch a starting role. We all know he will go 442 Thumb down , we are so predictable to play against at home, so I expect Watford to play 3 central midfielders, like everybody else seem to do at Hillsborough. We got tonked 1-4 last season and we were very poor defensively that day, should be much tighter tomorrow though.

I can't see SG making that many changes especially after everyone should be fresh after the break.  Obviously Maguire being out is forced on him and I wonder if he will replace him with Maguire and put Palmer out on the right side of midfield, with Buxton at RB.  That would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for Drenthe and Hope but as we don't own them anyway I am not too bothered about that!!

Who is this other MAGUIRE we got SCO have we signed his bro?? Huh Rolleyes Doh Big Grin

The South African justice system really is something else.

I wouldn't be surprised if Reeva Steenkamp's parents end up having to pay for a new bathroom door.


First woman on the Moon:
"Houston, we have a problem."
What?
"Never mind"
What's the problem?
"Nothing"
Please tell us?
"You know what the problem is."

Soz Amelia


Confused Confused
Amelia Chaffinch likes this post
Illegitimi non carborundum
Reply
#89
I'm moving to SA asap HG  Laugh

Disclaimer

To whom it may concern that may be offended by the above comment :-

It was a little joke (remember them) inferring that I could get rid of my wife, whom I do love and have been with since 1986 and can't possibly live without anyway, and live the life of Riley (who in actual fact was a member of the IRA in the 1920's who kept evading the British Justice system, hence the saying Living the Life of Riley). The comment above does not reflect my thoughts on the verdict or sentencing in that murdering bastards trial either Whistle
Owlshighgreen likes this post
and complicated
Reply
#90
1986? xxxx hell you neeed to get some starange

Agaain I'm pissed and this can be counter as a text to an ex Big Grin
Removed until we're actually on our way back  Doh
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)