Thread Rating:
Scottish Cup quarter-final replay - ICT v Hibs
#41
They have as much chance as your manky mob if winning it so why shouldn't they blow there trumpets??
Reply
#42
(17-03-2016, 09:40)supercooper Wrote: No doubt we will be hearing about an all conquering resurgant Hibs from greetin face now.

Flip flop to "Stokes the saviour and don't say didn't tell you".
Reply
#43
What a journey to the Caledonian Stadium but it ended up well worth it Thumb up Thumb up And great to see a huge number of Hibs fans taking over about 3/4 of their stadium. That's us in another semi-final and we've turned over another Scottish Premiership team - NOT BAD FOR A SUPPOSEDLY SHIT HIBS TEAM EHHHHHHHH!!!!! Tongue  At long last, the pen box striker, who we've been missing for a while, has delivered the goods. I must say I was pensive when I saw the same strike pairing being announced but Stubbs had thankfully dropped Thomo and had Keatings playing close to Stokesy - a good move by the manager! In Cummings defence, he 'worked his socks off' last night as did big Bartley, who was immense, and Fontaine played a game that was 'taking no prisoners' - he got 'wired in'!!! All aware of the post Hampden criticism?? I'll bet!! This match should've been over by HT as Hibs pounded their defence to score the third goal. As for the second half. What a bizarre match it turned out to be with end to end footie in the final quarter and how Stokes and Cummings didn't score a goal between them is beyond me but it certainly made for good entertainment incl the bizarre incidents with Oxley! I gather he lost a contact lens but boyyyyy, what a song and dance act! We got our first look at the Finnish goalie, Virtanen, and this lad is a big goalie who was nervous as f##### and hesitant - no wonder after being thrown in to a powder keg of a match and Stubbs thankfully kept his wits about him by replacing Keatings and placing Gunnarson into our defence - should've done it sooner!!
I listened to Yogi's pre-match interview on the car radio and I thought he gave a good Hibs team talk with his comments about Hibs 'banging on the door' etc and he did us a favour by fielding Meekings and Foran in his team - both played reasonably well but they are not fully match fit. Then he opted for a 4-2-4 formation at the tail end of this match and gave us every opportunity tae bury them!! And then he opted for two defenders at the back - more opportunities to score Hibs goals!!
Anyway - we've beaten a team that we don't beat very often, JOB DONE!! Thumb up Also great to hear Stubbs defiant post match interview and having a real go at certain media people, and others, relishing Hibs misfortune - well GIRUY!! Lets use this result as a huge spring board to better times Stubbsy!! Also Darren Mac and the Ox out of the semi v United - lets get all our injured players up n running for the big push towards the end of the season.

GGTTH
Reply
#44
"How did I play "zero part in it"? No, I haven't been picked for the first team yet this season but any money that i have spent with the club is part of an ongoing success story.  You have no clue whatsoever about my contribution to the success of rangers beyond what you glean here"






You have no clue whatsoever about the contribution of those that turned up at hampden last weekend yet you still saw fit to denigrate them. So you lose any consideration on that front.

The one weekend a year uber-fan. President of the remote control loyal, member of the "what channels it on larry? RSC"

"ongoing success story"  Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh  Does that include getting rode in the ramsdens cup ?
0762 likes this post
Reply
#45
(17-03-2016, 13:08)hibeejim21 Wrote: "How did I play "zero part in it"? No, I haven't been picked for the first team yet this season but any money that i have spent with the club is part of an ongoing success story.  You have no clue whatsoever about my contribution to the success of rangers beyond what you glean here"






You have no clue whatsoever about the contribution of those that turned up at hampden last weekend yet you still saw fit to denigrate them. So you lose any consideration on that front.

The one weekend a year uber-fan. President of the remote control loyal, member of the "what channels it on larry? RSC"

"ongoing success story"  Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh  Does that include getting rode in the ramsdens cup ?

In reverse order:

Rangers have probably lost more finals than hibs have qualified for. 

   

3 weekends

Every clue: 9k vs 30k says it all. I go to see Rangers and I'm lucky to get a ticket. You go to see hibs and you're lucky to get someone sitting next to you.
Reply
#46
So you have no idea what others are contributing in shares,hibs tv,merchandise etc etc but you feel you are somehow elevated above them by the odd trip to the charlie green big top.

A petrofac cup final on a real supporters allocation tae. You are absolutely shameless having a pop at anyone being fairweather. Shameless.
Reply
#47
A failure to reach agreement with creditors on 14 June 2012 led to The Rangers Football Club Plc (since renamed RFC 2012 Plc)[76] entering the process of liquidation.[77]

After the CVA proposal was rejected, the Administrators completed a going concern sale of the business and assets to a new company Sevco Scotland Ltd, later renamed The Rangers Football Club Ltd.[78][79] When the new company failed to secure the club's previous place in the Scottish Premier League,[80] Rangers were accepted into the Scottish Football League and placed in the lowest division, the Third, rather than the First Division as the SPL and SFA had sought.[81] The transfer of Rangers' SFA membership was agreed by the SFA upon acceptance of a number of conditions, including a one-year transfer ban, in time for the club to begin the 2012–13 season.[82]

Hibeejim, off topic but note The 'sevco' Rangers have played in only one minor lost cup final and at the moment they are still operating at a loss in spite of the high number of fans that support them!
Reply
#48
(17-03-2016, 13:36)hibeejim21 Wrote: So you have no idea what others are contributing in shares,hibs tv,merchandise etc etc but you feel you are somehow elevated above them by the odd trip to the charlie green big top.

A petrofac cup final on a real supporters allocation tae. You are absolutely shameless having a pop at anyone being fairweather. Shameless.

Yep. Got my brothers allocation and lucky to get it to.

Its being a fan if a well supported club. Must be bliss when getting tickets to see your team is easier that getting a train ticket.

(17-03-2016, 13:36)0762 Wrote: A failure to reach agreement with creditors on 14 June 2012 led to The Rangers Football Club Plc (since renamed RFC 2012 Plc)[76] entering the process of liquidation.[77]

After the CVA proposal was rejected, the Administrators completed a going concern sale of the business and assets to a new company Sevco Scotland Ltd, later renamed The Rangers Football Club Ltd.[78][79] When the new company failed to secure the club's previous place in the Scottish Premier League,[80] Rangers were accepted into the Scottish Football League and placed in the lowest division, the Third, rather than the First Division as the SPL and SFA had sought.[81] The transfer of Rangers' SFA membership was agreed by the SFA upon acceptance of a number of conditions, including a one-year transfer ban, in time for the club to begin the 2012–13 season.[82]

Hibeejim, off topic but note The 'sevco' Rangers have played in only one minor lost cup final and at the moment they are still operating at a loss in spite of the high number of fans that support them!

Ffs, this from a fan of a club sporting the original "hiatus" yet claiming the trophies of the previous club.

You couldn't make it up. Well you could.
Reply
#49
(17-03-2016, 13:36)0762 Wrote: When the new company failed to secure the club's previous place in the Scottish Premier League,[80] Rangers were accepted into the Scottish Football League and placed in the lowest division, the Third, rather than the First Division as the SPL and SFA had sought.[81] The transfer of Rangers' SFA membership was agreed by the SFA upon acceptance of a number of conditions, 
Everything there points to Rangers being the same club. Not in the SPL, so enter the SFL instead, transfer the SFA membership not apply for a new one.
You idiots refuse to see the wood for the trees.
Reply
#50
(17-03-2016, 14:15)Trusevich Wrote:
(17-03-2016, 13:36)0762 Wrote: When the new company failed to secure the club's previous place in the Scottish Premier League,[80] Rangers were accepted into the Scottish Football League and placed in the lowest division, the Third, rather than the First Division as the SPL and SFA had sought.[81] The transfer of Rangers' SFA membership was agreed by the SFA upon acceptance of a number of conditions, 
Everything there points to Rangers being the same club. Not in the SPL, so enter the SFL instead, transfer the SFA membership not apply for a new one.
You idiots refuse to see the wood for the trees.

The irony is that they support a club that actually ceases to exist for at least a season and certainly long enough to miss out on being founder members of the league.

Yet they claim the history. Not so long ago one of the was banging on about being one of the original names on the Scottish Cup: yet it was a different club. Just shared a name. By their own logic of course. I wouldn't deny a diddy team one of their few successes
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)