Thread Rating:
Match Thread - SWFC v Rotherham
Nice work from McGeady, Walace and Hooper and almost a goal for Hunt!! Much better from us in the second half of this half.
Reply
No one interfered with play

We were effing robbed, yet again. That's what we get for questioning one of their own's decisions...
Reply
utter xxxx rubbish crossing and heading and defending from us and the ref helps xxxx us over for a point !!
Reply
(05-03-2016, 17:49)Maddix Wrote:
(05-03-2016, 17:47)St Charles Owl Wrote: Is it possible he disallowed the goal for offside??  Turner looked offside when McGeady shot??

That's what WW reckon it was for and they say it was the correct decision  Confused

Yes, tv is focusing on the ball not being out but Turner is standing offside and the ball hits him.  There was no appeal for a goal kick from their players it was for the offside.
Reply
(05-03-2016, 17:50)Statesideowl Wrote: No one interfered with play

We were effing robbed, yet again. That's what we get for questioning one of their own's decisions...

According to WW it deflected in off Turner's heel even if he knew nowt about it.
and complicated
Reply
ive lost the link thank xxxx !! im off out bollocks to this shit !!
Reply
(05-03-2016, 17:50)Statesideowl Wrote: No one interfered with play

We were effing robbed, yet again. That's what we get for questioning one of their own's decisions...

The ball deflected off Turner who was the one offside, would like to see it again but if he was offside then he was totally interfering unfortunately.
Reply
Nice to see we woke up late on, we deserve something from this game.
Reply
Yes, we finished the half much better. McGeady was our best attacking player but the whole side needs to work on crosses and set pieces because they have been poor recently.
Reply
Agree with that. Crossing has been abysmal.

Pick up where we left off and we might get a point. However, only 3pt is good enough
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)