09-02-2015, 17:19
6 in squad, 5 in starting XI
Removed until we're actually on our way back

Match Thread - Ipswich Town
|
(09-02-2015, 15:58)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: Bastard in the black One important thing to add about Stuart Atwell is that he allows players to physically challenge the keeper (I hope SG tells the players this). In those matches, we were twice the beneficiaries of goals resulting from strong challenges on the keeper. Varney knocked the keeper over against Newcastle & JOC scored and Madine knocked the keeper over at Barnsley & COG scored. If SG is doing his job right both our strikers & keeper will know what to expect. Heard last week that Mourinho does a six page report for his players on the referee. Doubt SG does. AAHHH 2-1 McGugan
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
09-02-2015, 18:59
I thought it was about 5 ( loanees) Thurny!
Baker injured perhaps? or simply didn't fit into the 4-4-2 golden boy Maguire must play shape that SG insists upon.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius
09-02-2015, 19:03
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2015, 19:11 by St Charles Owl.)
We were not at the limit for loan players, we have played more than that in previous seasons!!
1-0 McGugan and ADDDH. (09-02-2015, 14:46)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: ADHDD Typical of the younger generation, no natural morals, no sense of what is right or wrong!!! It seems that the "educated" younger citizens in our society have to be told about rules that are morally a given anyway!!! The match threads have always been Wednesday score first and since before you were a twinkle in your mother's eye, predicting a defeat has not been allowed (unless otherwise stated in the match thread)!! Thankfully I can work out what scoreline people are predicting without resorting to petty and vindictive "snitching" on others!!! ![]() The other key phrase there is "Maddix used to", but he no longer does, so its my rules until I tell you otherwise!!! Of course if and when Maddix wants to do a match thread, then it will be his rules until he tells you otherwise. But the moral, given rules will still apply, see if you can remember those in between your university classes!! ![]() (09-02-2015, 19:03)St Charles Owl Wrote: We were not at the limit for loan players, we have played more than that in previous seasons!! We once had one more than we should have in the match-day squad. I think we got away with a fine. ![]() This is the rule: 52.2.1 A maximum of 5 loan Players (Standard, International, Emergency or Youth) can be named in the Players listed on a team sheet for any individual match played under the auspices of The League. This figure shall include any additional loan of a goalkeeper approved by the Executive under the provisions of Regulation 54. ![]()
09-02-2015, 19:43
(09-02-2015, 19:03)St Charles Owl Wrote: We were not at the limit for loan players, we have played more than that in previous seasons!! Not snitching on anyone, just pointing out that Maddix did the match threads correctly ![]()
Removed until we're actually on our way back
![]()
09-02-2015, 20:08
(09-02-2015, 19:44)Imre varadi Wrote: No they havnt because i di them for 2 seasons and i used the Home & away system like everyone else in the world of football does Now you just sound like SG!! Don't change the format, "442" is what has always been used!!! We should just call you Stuart from now on!! ![]()
09-02-2015, 20:58
(09-02-2015, 20:08)St Charles Owl Wrote:(09-02-2015, 19:44)Imre varadi Wrote: No they havnt because i di them for 2 seasons and i used the Home & away system like everyone else in the world of football does You're just like Dave Jones, taking a winning formula and destroying it without admitting you're wrong ![]() ![]()
Removed until we're actually on our way back
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|