Thread Rating:
Court action over wifi
#41
(15-01-2016, 19:45)TheWorthinGer Wrote:
(15-01-2016, 19:38)St Charles Owl Wrote: Wothing, in my opinion the opening statement you made in the post I deleted bore no resemblance to the truth.  It had nothing to do with the debate that was going on.  I have now deleted numerous posts regarding or stemming from Supercoopers original child abuse post on the Hibs board, when El Car next logs on, as a mod he can still see these posts and if he feels my deletion of two posts on here were incorrect then as the Ranger mod he is able to reinstate them.

"No relation to the truth"? Completely factual. Would you like some links relating to the conviction of two of said clubs employees?

Messrs Rix and Thom(p)son.

I don't deal in fiction, thank you.

Your opening statement did not refer to those two though, it was a generalized sweeping statement about the club.  The other point is that without Supercooper making his first statement this would not even be a topic, especially not on a thread about a wifi accessibility court case!!
Reply
#42
So all in all the club is looking in rude health.

It's amazing the barometer of what decency is to certain people.
Reply
#43
At least some o' us have decency
Reply
#44
(15-01-2016, 19:48)St Charles Owl Wrote:
(15-01-2016, 19:45)TheWorthinGer Wrote:
(15-01-2016, 19:38)St Charles Owl Wrote: Wothing, in my opinion the opening statement you made in the post I deleted bore no resemblance to the truth.  It had nothing to do with the debate that was going on.  I have now deleted numerous posts regarding or stemming from Supercoopers original child abuse post on the Hibs board, when El Car next logs on, as a mod he can still see these posts and if he feels my deletion of two posts on here were incorrect then as the Ranger mod he is able to reinstate them.

"No relation to the truth"? Completely factual. Would you like some links relating to the conviction of two of said clubs employees?

Messrs Rix and Thom(p)son.

I don't deal in fiction, thank you.

Your opening statement did not refer to those two though, it was a generalized sweeping statement about the club.  The other point is that without Supercooper making his first statement this would not even be a topic, especially not on a thread about a wifi accessibility court case!!

Yes it did. I stated quite clearly that being a fan of a club that had harboured child abusers had obviously affected his judgement.

I paraphrase myself but it's close enough and I stand by it.

(15-01-2016, 19:51)supercooper Wrote: So all in all the club is looking in rude health.


It's amazing the barometer of what decency is to certain people.

These people wouldn't recognise decency if it shat in their tea.

Leading the way in hypocrisy, that's the only standard they set.
Reply
#45
Rangers supporters trying tae tell everybody else aboot decency after everything their clubs done over the last 20 years. The world is fucked
Reply
#46
(15-01-2016, 21:43)Paigntonhibby Wrote: Rangers supporters trying tae tell everybody else aboot decency after everything their clubs done over the last 20 years. The world is fucked

QED

Just like your club, your argument is built on dubious foundations.
Reply
#47
The sevco hoardes are creaming themselves with the news of £500000 loss. Laughable the naivety of these folk. Let's not forget the payday loans pumped in on a regular basis by the 3 bears et all just to keep things ticking over and the doors open and this will continue through until the end of the season. Truth will all be revealed in ANNUAL Accounts, which once more should be interesting.
HHGH
Reply
#48
There's more to life than money.
Reply
#49
There is indeed! common decency being one of them.
Reply
#50
(15-01-2016, 21:57)TIN TIN Wrote: Let's not forget the loans pumped in on a regular basis by the 3 bears et all just to keep things ticking over and the doors open

So do Hearts. The only difference is the foundation of hearts is funded by a larger number of people, but it's still all about putting up cash in exchange for equity to cover the shortfall of a company operating at a loss.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)