[BaggieMan]

The poor finish only cost us 3.8 ( two places ), the dire football cost us tv appearances, the Midlands area cost us merchandising revenue, not to much disposable cash around, the FA / media / ffp bias to a few clubs cost a lot of teams global merchandising as its nearly a closed shop. The takeover cost us four transfer Windows hence an aging / tiring squad.

Not all our woes are TP induced.

Yow'm, me ode mucka Aries and the Baggieman are on the same wavelength 4eva !
Thart also a grand lad mah mate !

[4evaabaggie]

Baggieman, om not dissing anyone on here, we're all muckas, just for historical accuracy wanted to separate the issues .......

[aries22]

The poor finish only cost us 3.8 ( two places ), the dire football cost us tv appearances, the Midlands area cost us merchandising revenue, not to much disposable cash around, the FA / media / ffp bias to a few clubs cost a lot of teams global merchandising as its nearly a closed shop. The takeover cost us four transfer Windows hence an aging / tiring squad.

Not all our woes are TP induced.

Doesn't matter which way you cut the cake, we forfeited £8 million through poor results and dire football, which was down to the players and TP. Despite the four 'lost' windows, during which we still managed to sign decent players like Evans, Fletcher, Rondon, Chadli, Nyom, Livermore and Phillips, we were 8th after 26 games but the last 12 games yielded one win, two draws and nine defeats.

[4evaabaggie]

Aries22, can't argue with that ......... although we signed some decent players we still lacked full backs and pace but you are right we should have picked up more than five points from almost a third of the season.