Thread Rating:
Takeover
drewks Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 2,897
Threads: 86
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 7
#69
09-09-2016, 08:33
(08-09-2016, 23:57)Stairs Wrote: Hurrah!!!

I am 56, nearly 57.

It's time for the club to grow a pair and make a big bold move. Aim big or go out in a blaze of glory.

Get a positive young manager, play attacking football, take a risk.

Like we had 4 years ago....we sacked him......he's now at Villa Sick Doh
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Takeover - by Stairs - 19-06-2016, 20:46
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 19:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 20-06-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 20:54
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 21-06-2016, 00:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-06-2016, 15:28
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BBB - 26-07-2016, 14:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 06-07-2016, 23:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-07-2016, 22:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 11-07-2016, 09:11
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 11-07-2016, 16:18
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 13-07-2016, 21:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 13-07-2016, 22:32
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 13-07-2016, 22:37
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 14-07-2016, 00:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-07-2016, 01:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 10:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 17:06
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 22-07-2016, 18:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 22-07-2016, 19:48
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 25-07-2016, 16:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 25-07-2016, 19:39
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 26-07-2016, 08:16
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 26-07-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 26-07-2016, 16:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 14:00
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 15:40
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 17:27
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 27-07-2016, 18:51
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 19:24
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 13:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 27-07-2016, 20:07
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 30-07-2016, 09:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 30-07-2016, 10:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by tidy - 02-08-2016, 14:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 02-08-2016, 09:59
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Bournemouth Baggie - 02-08-2016, 19:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by exteecee - 05-08-2016, 09:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 05-08-2016, 09:23
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 05-08-2016, 10:13
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 05-08-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 05-08-2016, 13:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 05-08-2016, 14:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 05-08-2016, 14:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 14:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 15:26
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 15:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by The Quantum Enigma - 05-08-2016, 16:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by derbybaggie - 05-08-2016, 16:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 05-08-2016, 17:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 05-08-2016, 17:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 05-08-2016, 17:57
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 05-08-2016, 22:11
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 21:20
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 22:19
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 23:42
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 23:59
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 06-08-2016, 10:45
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 06-08-2016, 16:07
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 07-08-2016, 23:47
RE: Takeover - by talkSAFT - 08-08-2016, 09:32
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 09-08-2016, 14:11
RE: Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 10-08-2016, 13:26
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-08-2016, 15:32
RE: Takeover - by Baggie_One - 08-09-2016, 10:31
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 08-09-2016, 14:47
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 08-09-2016, 23:57
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 09-09-2016, 08:33
RE: Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 16-09-2016, 02:59
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 09-09-2016, 08:38
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-09-2016, 18:40
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 16-09-2016, 01:25
RE: Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 16-09-2016, 18:39
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 16-09-2016, 18:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)