Thread Rating:
Takeover
drewks Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 2,897
Threads: 86
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 7
#58
05-08-2016, 23:59 (This post was last modified: 06-08-2016, 01:04 by Ska'dForLife-WBA.)
(05-08-2016, 23:42)Beefy 1965 Wrote:
(05-08-2016, 22:19)drewks Wrote: As he is a fan as well as our chair,  it would be interesting to hear what JP has to say on this, but I've not found any meaningful statement from him yet. Has anyone found anything or got a link?

==========================================================================
Peace's farewell message comes across as a really heartfelt piece.

Thanks Beefy.
That's a lovely, and I'm sure, genuine and heartfelt statement from JP.
What a star.
Personally,  I've never knocked him , and I shudder to think where we might be if it wasn't for him.
GOOD ON YER,  JP'  Big Grin  Thumb up  Thumb up
wiltshire baggie, Stairs, BaggieSteve And 4 others like this post
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Takeover - by Stairs - 19-06-2016, 20:46
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 19:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 20-06-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 20:54
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 21-06-2016, 00:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-06-2016, 15:28
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BBB - 26-07-2016, 14:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 06-07-2016, 23:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-07-2016, 22:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 11-07-2016, 09:11
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 11-07-2016, 16:18
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 13-07-2016, 21:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 13-07-2016, 22:32
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 13-07-2016, 22:37
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 14-07-2016, 00:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-07-2016, 01:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 10:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 17:06
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 22-07-2016, 18:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 22-07-2016, 19:48
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 25-07-2016, 16:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 25-07-2016, 19:39
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 26-07-2016, 08:16
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 26-07-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 26-07-2016, 16:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 14:00
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 15:40
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 17:27
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 27-07-2016, 18:51
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 19:24
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 13:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 27-07-2016, 20:07
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 30-07-2016, 09:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 30-07-2016, 10:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by tidy - 02-08-2016, 14:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 02-08-2016, 09:59
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Bournemouth Baggie - 02-08-2016, 19:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by exteecee - 05-08-2016, 09:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 05-08-2016, 09:23
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 05-08-2016, 10:13
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 05-08-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 05-08-2016, 13:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 05-08-2016, 14:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 05-08-2016, 14:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 14:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 15:26
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 15:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by The Quantum Enigma - 05-08-2016, 16:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by derbybaggie - 05-08-2016, 16:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 05-08-2016, 17:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 05-08-2016, 17:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 05-08-2016, 17:57
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 05-08-2016, 22:11
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 21:20
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 22:19
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 23:42
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 23:59
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 06-08-2016, 10:45
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 06-08-2016, 16:07
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 07-08-2016, 23:47
RE: Takeover - by talkSAFT - 08-08-2016, 09:32
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 09-08-2016, 14:11
RE: Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 10-08-2016, 13:26
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-08-2016, 15:32
RE: Takeover - by Baggie_One - 08-09-2016, 10:31
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 08-09-2016, 14:47
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 08-09-2016, 23:57
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 09-09-2016, 08:33
RE: Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 16-09-2016, 02:59
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 09-09-2016, 08:38
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-09-2016, 18:40
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 16-09-2016, 01:25
RE: Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 16-09-2016, 18:39
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 16-09-2016, 18:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)