Thread Rating:
Takeover
Baggievicar Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 1,144
Threads: 22
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 4
#55
05-08-2016, 22:11 (This post was last modified: 05-08-2016, 22:14 by Baggievicar.)
(05-08-2016, 17:57)TheBaggieMan Wrote: Perhaps we should ask BaggieVicar if we should name one of the stands 'Peace be with you'  

Whistle

Well, it's a bit dangerous doing that when Jeremy's gone - the prophet Jeremiah says that saying, "Peace, peace" when there is no peace is a recipe for 'terror on every side'. Which I believe to be ancient Hebrew for 'relegation'.
© Dodgy-theological-interpretations-R-Us 2016

Away for a week from tomorrow morning. Try not to provoke the apocalypse before I get back, eh.
derbybaggie and drewks like this post
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Takeover - by Stairs - 19-06-2016, 20:46
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 19:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 20-06-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 20:54
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 21-06-2016, 00:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-06-2016, 15:28
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BBB - 26-07-2016, 14:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 06-07-2016, 23:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-07-2016, 22:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 11-07-2016, 09:11
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 11-07-2016, 16:18
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 13-07-2016, 21:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 13-07-2016, 22:32
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 13-07-2016, 22:37
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 14-07-2016, 00:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-07-2016, 01:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 10:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 17:06
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 22-07-2016, 18:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 22-07-2016, 19:48
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 25-07-2016, 16:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 25-07-2016, 19:39
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 26-07-2016, 08:16
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 26-07-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 26-07-2016, 16:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 14:00
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 15:40
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 17:27
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 27-07-2016, 18:51
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 19:24
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 13:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 27-07-2016, 20:07
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 30-07-2016, 09:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 30-07-2016, 10:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by tidy - 02-08-2016, 14:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 02-08-2016, 09:59
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Bournemouth Baggie - 02-08-2016, 19:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by exteecee - 05-08-2016, 09:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 05-08-2016, 09:23
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 05-08-2016, 10:13
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 05-08-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 05-08-2016, 13:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 05-08-2016, 14:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 05-08-2016, 14:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 14:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 15:26
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 15:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by The Quantum Enigma - 05-08-2016, 16:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by derbybaggie - 05-08-2016, 16:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 05-08-2016, 17:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 05-08-2016, 17:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 05-08-2016, 17:57
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 05-08-2016, 22:11
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 21:20
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 22:19
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 23:42
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 23:59
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 06-08-2016, 10:45
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 06-08-2016, 16:07
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 07-08-2016, 23:47
RE: Takeover - by talkSAFT - 08-08-2016, 09:32
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 09-08-2016, 14:11
RE: Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 10-08-2016, 13:26
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-08-2016, 15:32
RE: Takeover - by Baggie_One - 08-09-2016, 10:31
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 08-09-2016, 14:47
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 08-09-2016, 23:57
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 09-09-2016, 08:33
RE: Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 16-09-2016, 02:59
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 09-09-2016, 08:38
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-09-2016, 18:40
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 16-09-2016, 01:25
RE: Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 16-09-2016, 18:39
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 16-09-2016, 18:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)