Thread Rating:
Takeover
Beefy 1965 Offline
Carer For Binman & Bomber !
*****
Posts: 5,760
Threads: 315
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 15
#47
05-08-2016, 15:26
baggie96
Youth Baggie
***
Posts: 655

Re: Guochuan Lai
« Reply #3800 on: Today at 01:08:02 PM »
Quote
Quote from: paulosull on Today at 01:05:36 PM
is there any chance that Wanda are involved with sports group as I think could be wrong that they are connected to biggest club in Chinese league?

I'm still hearing evergrande are involved, makes sense as both heavily linked with Guangzhou.
2x Premier League Champ 1x Championship Winner and World cup Winner
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Takeover - by Stairs - 19-06-2016, 20:46
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 19:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 20-06-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 20:54
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 21-06-2016, 00:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-06-2016, 15:28
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BBB - 26-07-2016, 14:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 06-07-2016, 23:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-07-2016, 22:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 11-07-2016, 09:11
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 11-07-2016, 16:18
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 13-07-2016, 21:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 13-07-2016, 22:32
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 13-07-2016, 22:37
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 14-07-2016, 00:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-07-2016, 01:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 10:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 17:06
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 22-07-2016, 18:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 22-07-2016, 19:48
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 25-07-2016, 16:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 25-07-2016, 19:39
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 26-07-2016, 08:16
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 26-07-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 26-07-2016, 16:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 14:00
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 15:40
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 17:27
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 27-07-2016, 18:51
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 19:24
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 13:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 27-07-2016, 20:07
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 30-07-2016, 09:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 30-07-2016, 10:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by tidy - 02-08-2016, 14:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 02-08-2016, 09:59
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Bournemouth Baggie - 02-08-2016, 19:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by exteecee - 05-08-2016, 09:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 05-08-2016, 09:23
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 05-08-2016, 10:13
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 05-08-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 05-08-2016, 13:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 05-08-2016, 14:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 05-08-2016, 14:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 14:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 15:26
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 15:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by The Quantum Enigma - 05-08-2016, 16:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by derbybaggie - 05-08-2016, 16:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 05-08-2016, 17:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 05-08-2016, 17:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 05-08-2016, 17:57
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 05-08-2016, 22:11
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 21:20
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 22:19
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 23:42
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 23:59
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 06-08-2016, 10:45
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 06-08-2016, 16:07
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 07-08-2016, 23:47
RE: Takeover - by talkSAFT - 08-08-2016, 09:32
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 09-08-2016, 14:11
RE: Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 10-08-2016, 13:26
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-08-2016, 15:32
RE: Takeover - by Baggie_One - 08-09-2016, 10:31
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 08-09-2016, 14:47
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 08-09-2016, 23:57
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 09-09-2016, 08:33
RE: Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 16-09-2016, 02:59
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 09-09-2016, 08:38
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-09-2016, 18:40
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 16-09-2016, 01:25
RE: Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 16-09-2016, 18:39
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 16-09-2016, 18:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)