Thread Rating:
Takeover
tidy Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 549
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 4
#36
02-08-2016, 14:50 (This post was last modified: 02-08-2016, 14:50 by tidy.)
(30-07-2016, 10:10)TheBaggieMan Wrote: Ho, Ho, Ho,  I see that the Dingles have sacked Kenny 'The Saint' Jacket  - the Dingle Savoir.

Maybe, just maybe, we will have the same luck if we are taken over by the Chinese and 'Clueless' Pulis is posted his P45. How sweet would that be ?

I had an e-mail from the ticket office this week asking why I hadn't renewed my season ticket of many years - an easy one word reply was sent - PULIS.  

Whistle

Wolves new owner sacked Kenny and then replaced him with...Walter Zenga ffs....one of the biggest clowns currently in football.

Be very careful what you wish for BaggieMan.

Jus sayin.... Whistle
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Messages In This Thread
Takeover - by Stairs - 19-06-2016, 20:46
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 19:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 20-06-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 20-06-2016, 20:54
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 21-06-2016, 00:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-06-2016, 15:28
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BBB - 26-07-2016, 14:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 06-07-2016, 23:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-07-2016, 22:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 11-07-2016, 09:11
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 11-07-2016, 16:18
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 13-07-2016, 21:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 13-07-2016, 22:32
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 13-07-2016, 22:37
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 14-07-2016, 00:02
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-07-2016, 01:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 10:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 22-07-2016, 17:06
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 22-07-2016, 18:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 22-07-2016, 19:48
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 25-07-2016, 16:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 25-07-2016, 19:39
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 26-07-2016, 08:16
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 26-07-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 26-07-2016, 16:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 14:00
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 15:40
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 17:27
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 27-07-2016, 18:51
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 27-07-2016, 19:24
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 13:33
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 27-07-2016, 20:07
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 27-07-2016, 20:35
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 30-07-2016, 09:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 30-07-2016, 10:10
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by tidy - 02-08-2016, 14:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 02-08-2016, 09:59
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Bournemouth Baggie - 02-08-2016, 19:50
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by exteecee - 05-08-2016, 09:22
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggie_One - 05-08-2016, 09:23
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Worldclassalbion - 05-08-2016, 10:13
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 05-08-2016, 11:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Stairs - 05-08-2016, 13:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 05-08-2016, 14:04
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by talkSAFT - 05-08-2016, 14:30
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 14:20
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 15:26
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 15:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by The Quantum Enigma - 05-08-2016, 16:56
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by derbybaggie - 05-08-2016, 16:58
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Ska'dForLife-WBA - 05-08-2016, 17:31
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 05-08-2016, 17:47
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by BaggieMan - 05-08-2016, 17:57
RE: Takeover still possible but not currently by a Chinese Consortium Takeover - by Baggievicar - 05-08-2016, 22:11
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 21:20
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 22:19
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 05-08-2016, 23:42
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 05-08-2016, 23:59
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 06-08-2016, 10:45
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 06-08-2016, 16:07
RE: Takeover - by BBB - 07-08-2016, 23:47
RE: Takeover - by talkSAFT - 08-08-2016, 09:32
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 09-08-2016, 14:11
RE: Takeover - by Salopbaggie - 10-08-2016, 13:26
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 10-08-2016, 15:32
RE: Takeover - by Baggie_One - 08-09-2016, 10:31
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 08-09-2016, 14:47
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 08-09-2016, 23:57
RE: Takeover - by drewks - 09-09-2016, 08:33
RE: Takeover - by BaggyBomber - 16-09-2016, 02:59
RE: Takeover - by Stairs - 09-09-2016, 08:38
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 15-09-2016, 18:40
RE: Takeover - by Beefy 1965 - 16-09-2016, 01:25
RE: Takeover - by Dingle-Dingle - 16-09-2016, 18:39
RE: Takeover - by 4evaabaggie - 16-09-2016, 18:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)