Did you know that the state in which you live almost changed its name this week? The Belfast Telegraph reported that Unionists in NI welcomed a climbdown by the Brit govt over customs regs that proposed changing all mentions of the "United Kingdom" to "Great Britain" while removing all mention of Northern Ireland. Another clear example of the whole obsessive nature of these fascist Brexit morons re Great Britain and the GB brand that infuriates me beyond belief!!
Sky News reported that the Foreign Sec and UK Brexit negotiator, Liz Truss, ordered officials to investigate how the the Statutory Instrument was allowed as in multi amendments to the Customs (EU Exit) Regs 2022 it was proposed to impose this GB words enforcement. What is a SI? It's a power normally conferred on a Minister of the Crown. The minister is then able to make the law. Parliament can either approve or reject it, but can't amend it, thereby reducing scrutiny. You can see where I'm going with this eh - COULD SCOTLAND ONE DAY FIND ITSELF THE SUBJECT OF SUCH A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO HELP MATTERS "CONTINUE SMOOTHLY" AD INFINITUM????? The Brit govt and all the colluding Unionists - Labour, Lib Dem and others, are never gonna release Scotland easily from the "shackles" of a historically out of date doc called the Treaty of Union 1707 and that's a fact. We have a lot more to offer than these cretons are ever willing to reveal or admit and that is another fact as well as never accepting the inevitable break up of a fractured Union in the same way that they forced through the break up of the union/treaty with the EU. Their hypocrisy on the subject of self-determination is jaw dropping and it never changes!!
Just study some of their recent pro-constitution comments on Ukraine alone and be enlightened!! For example, both Boris Johnson and Sir Keir Starmer made statements, on tv no less, to the effect that nations and people do have the right to choose the government of their own choice AND OTHERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE!! So when we in Scotland talk about a Section 30 order, what is it that we actually want???????? Esp if say a Brit govt official like Johnson goes to a Supreme Court to argue against a Scotindy referendum that is precisely against the very words he has been preaching re the constitutional right of a sovereign country. Btw most political correspondents and foreign affairs progs regard the Sec 30 argument as a "red herring" and we don't need a Section 30 order anyway. There was a big debate a few weeks ago on a German News channel re this very subject, Scottish independence, and the unanimous view was that Scotland didn't need one. That is also the main consensus in Europe and the USA.
Sky News reported that the Foreign Sec and UK Brexit negotiator, Liz Truss, ordered officials to investigate how the the Statutory Instrument was allowed as in multi amendments to the Customs (EU Exit) Regs 2022 it was proposed to impose this GB words enforcement. What is a SI? It's a power normally conferred on a Minister of the Crown. The minister is then able to make the law. Parliament can either approve or reject it, but can't amend it, thereby reducing scrutiny. You can see where I'm going with this eh - COULD SCOTLAND ONE DAY FIND ITSELF THE SUBJECT OF SUCH A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO HELP MATTERS "CONTINUE SMOOTHLY" AD INFINITUM????? The Brit govt and all the colluding Unionists - Labour, Lib Dem and others, are never gonna release Scotland easily from the "shackles" of a historically out of date doc called the Treaty of Union 1707 and that's a fact. We have a lot more to offer than these cretons are ever willing to reveal or admit and that is another fact as well as never accepting the inevitable break up of a fractured Union in the same way that they forced through the break up of the union/treaty with the EU. Their hypocrisy on the subject of self-determination is jaw dropping and it never changes!!
Just study some of their recent pro-constitution comments on Ukraine alone and be enlightened!! For example, both Boris Johnson and Sir Keir Starmer made statements, on tv no less, to the effect that nations and people do have the right to choose the government of their own choice AND OTHERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE!! So when we in Scotland talk about a Section 30 order, what is it that we actually want???????? Esp if say a Brit govt official like Johnson goes to a Supreme Court to argue against a Scotindy referendum that is precisely against the very words he has been preaching re the constitutional right of a sovereign country. Btw most political correspondents and foreign affairs progs regard the Sec 30 argument as a "red herring" and we don't need a Section 30 order anyway. There was a big debate a few weeks ago on a German News channel re this very subject, Scottish independence, and the unanimous view was that Scotland didn't need one. That is also the main consensus in Europe and the USA.