Thread Rating:
Newcastle vs WBA - Match Thread
#31
Stats show us with one short off target, don't look like scoring,, and now vile are winning.
Reply
#32
At least one change will be made at half time surely.
Reply
#33
Right I'm off to put a bag of angry wasps down my underpants for the next 45 minutes - can't be any more painful than this load of bolloxxxxxxxx Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
Reply
#34
How to describe that first half display without using profanities?

Give up can't do it!!!  Angry Angry Angry
Reply
#35
Are we playingv a 5 5 0 formation .......
Reply
#36
(06-02-2016, 17:44)wba_1996 Wrote: The prick should be sacked on the spot. That line up is a disgrace to the history and tradition of this football club and an embarrassment to the sport.

I hope we get relegated if it means Pulis goes, then I can go back to supporting my team.


Hi 96, agree with all apart from the relegation bit.  As you will know, I was against the Pulis appointment from Day 1 and have campaigned for his removal ever since with the slight exception of the first Newcastle game and the Stoke and Chelsea games where we were more expansive. A lot of the original pro-Pulis guys on here are now having second thoughts.

Can't see us coming back from this one with this line-up.

Whistle
Reply
#37
But don't you realise that Pulis has never been relegated? We may be playing in front of empty stadia, grabbing vital 0 0 draws against teams at the bottom of the table and picking a team of defenders but we won't go down.
Except we might......Pulis out.
Reply
#38
HT - Newcastle 77.6% possession.
Reply
#39
Neither for or against Pulis ...... but getting worried now. A depleted toon with no defenders so we balance it by playing eight defenders ........ was hoping for a balanced performance and a win.. I've got a sinking feeling

(06-02-2016, 17:54)Squirrel Regis Wrote: HT - Newcastle 77.6% possession.

But they've only got one goal .... glass half full outlook.
Reply
#40
Well, at least Sulko and Pilchard coming on are a positive.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)