(29-01-2016, 17:21)supercooper Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 13:58)hibeejim21 Wrote: "Is that a direct quote Jim? And can you show where he said that."


Your quite right coops,i'm sure his lawyer just said it in court for a giggle.

So that would be a no then.

(29-01-2016, 16:36)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

hibeejim21 Wrote:"He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. "


There comes a point where you are just arguing for the sake of it ffs. He told the lawyer it had been paid back,it was later found out to be untrue. A lie.

You clearly think he is a solid,upstanding sort. fair enough.

---

Trusevich Wrote:Yup. Let me - no let us all know the thought processes that lead you to come to any other understanding of what he actually said.

Enlighten us.

Tell you what trus,you show me an example of someone taking a company out of liquidation in the manner king proposed and i'll have a go.

Enlighten me.

Anybody could buy the oldco out of liquidation.  At the point were the liquidator declares that they have realised all possible income and distributed to the creditors an offer can be made for the company.

 example.

(29-01-2016, 17:24)hibeejim21 Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 17:21)supercooper Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 13:58)hibeejim21 Wrote: "Is that a direct quote Jim? And can you show where he said that."


Your quite right coops,i'm sure his lawyer just said it in court for a giggle.

So that would be a no then.

Is that you finally answering whether you were offended by amaruso's racism now ?
Your a day late pal.

---

(29-01-2016, 16:36)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

hibeejim21 Wrote:"He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. "


There comes a point where you are just arguing for the sake of it ffs. He told the lawyer it had been paid back,it was later found out to be untrue. A lie.

You clearly think he is a solid,upstanding sort. fair enough.

---

Trusevich Wrote:Yup. Let me - no let us all know the thought processes that lead you to come to any other understanding of what he actually said.

Enlighten us.

Tell you what trus,you show me an example of someone taking a company out of liquidation in the manner king proposed and i'll have a go.

Enlighten me.

Anybody could buy the oldco out of liquidation.  At the point were the liquidator declares that they have realised all possible income and distributed to the creditors an offer can be made for the company.

 example.

That is nowhere near the same as what king laid out in his "vision" i'm afraid. 

This boy isn't trying to put portsmouth FCs assets back into the old company for a start off.

(29-01-2016, 19:11)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 17:24)hibeejim21 Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 17:21)supercooper Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 13:58)hibeejim21 Wrote: "Is that a direct quote Jim? And can you show where he said that."


Your quite right coops,i'm sure his lawyer just said it in court for a giggle.

So that would be a no then.

Is that you finally answering whether you were offended by amaruso's racism now ?
Your a day late pal.

---

(29-01-2016, 16:36)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

hibeejim21 Wrote:"He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. "


There comes a point where you are just arguing for the sake of it ffs. He told the lawyer it had been paid back,it was later found out to be untrue. A lie.

You clearly think he is a solid,upstanding sort. fair enough.

---

Trusevich Wrote:Yup. Let me - no let us all know the thought processes that lead you to come to any other understanding of what he actually said.

Enlighten us.

Tell you what trus,you show me an example of someone taking a company out of liquidation in the manner king proposed and i'll have a go.

Enlighten me.

Anybody could buy the oldco out of liquidation.  At the point were the liquidator declares that they have realised all possible income and distributed to the creditors an offer can be made for the company.

 example.

That is nowhere near the same as what king laid out in his "vision" i'm afraid. 

This boy isn't trying to put portsmouth FCs assets back into the old company for a start off.

You wouldn't need to. A company doesn't need assets. You said an example I gave you one. Now your not happy because you've been proved wrong - as you usually are.

Too easy.

---

Here's a wee question - if the lad from Portsmouth had the money could he use his PFC Ltd to buy the club's current holding company and all of its assets?

What's to stop him?

(29-01-2016, 19:35)hibeejim21 Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 19:11)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 17:24)hibeejim21 Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 17:21)supercooper Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 13:58)hibeejim21 Wrote: "Is that a direct quote Jim? And can you show where he said that."


Your quite right coops,i'm sure his lawyer just said it in court for a giggle.

So that would be a no then.

Is that you finally answering whether you were offended by amaruso's racism now ?
Your a day late pal.

---

(29-01-2016, 16:36)TheWorthinGer Wrote:

hibeejim21 Wrote:"He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. "


There comes a point where you are just arguing for the sake of it ffs. He told the lawyer it had been paid back,it was later found out to be untrue. A lie.

You clearly think he is a solid,upstanding sort. fair enough.

---

Tell you what trus,you show me an example of someone taking a company out of liquidation in the manner king proposed and i'll have a go.

Enlighten me.

Anybody could buy the oldco out of liquidation.  At the point were the liquidator declares that they have realised all possible income and distributed to the creditors an offer can be made for the company.

 example.

That is nowhere near the same as what king laid out in his "vision" i'm afraid. 

This boy isn't trying to put portsmouth FCs assets back into the old company for a start off.

You wouldn't need to. A company doesn't need assets. You said an example I gave you one. Now your not happy because you've been proved wrong - as you usually are.

Too easy.

---

Here's a wee question - if the lad from Portsmouth had the money could he use his PFC Ltd to buy the club's current holding company and all of its assets?

What's to stop him?

"in the manner king proposes" . This I just some idiot that's bought a name.

Just like you are some idiot who thinks he's always right.

(29-01-2016, 14:30)Trusevich Wrote:

(29-01-2016, 08:43)Paigntonhibby Wrote: And I've lied about what exactly, and I didnae accuse anybody o' being a glib and shameless liar, a judge did

You said Dave King promised a "£30M warchest". He said no such thing. You are a liar. A glib, shameless and crushingly dull liar.

---

(29-01-2016, 12:14)hibeejim21 Wrote: "there will be a NOMAD in place in days"

He said that at a time when he expected a NOMAD to be in place shortly. It turned out not to happen, but that doesn't make him a liar. He was wrong. Like you are most of the time.

(29-01-2016, 12:14)hibeejim21 Wrote: "I'll take the Oldco out of liquidation and resurrect the Old Rangers values and traditions"

He never said that either. He said he'd like to take the oldco out of liquidation. You're guilty of lying. Again.

(29-01-2016, 12:14)hibeejim21 Wrote: ""i've paid back sports direct....er hold on no i haven't"

He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. He was wrong, but it has been subsequently paid back.

You're guilty of lying again. Again.

(29-01-2016, 12:14)hibeejim21 Wrote: No one can seriously be arguing king hasn't told porkies ?  really ? 

Of course not. No one can seriously argue you haven't either. However, the difference is no one is making up shit about you to specifically label you as a liar. All your lies are your own doing.