![]() |
Acceptable Content - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: Acceptable Content (/showthread.php?tid=500) |
RE: Acceptable Content - Thurnscoe_OWL - 08-10-2014 so I CAN have an Eric Cartman signature? RE: Acceptable Content - St Charles Owl - 08-10-2014 (08-10-2014, 20:43)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: so I CAN have an Eric Cartman signature? I tell you what, you put up your new signature and I will tell you if its acceptable!!! And you know where my guidelines are after your attempt yesterday, so its up to you!!! ![]() RE: Acceptable Content - Thurnscoe_OWL - 08-10-2014 We'll compromise, I'll have Randy Marsh instead RE: Acceptable Content - A57owl - 08-10-2014 Thought I'd say something on this issue. For starters, this site is far better than the one we all abandoned. Swearing and nudity don't offend me personally, however, I can see that new backers/sponsors and some new users may not see the humour involved. I will miss the lucky boobs and bums but there are other websites available!! The C word should be blocked as I know many men and women who find it offensive. It still stands as 'the forbidden word' whilst F words,S words,and B words seem more acceptable in modern society. I agree with Imre, Thurnsoe and others when they say we have a good understanding group of posters who will shout from the rafters if they feel offended. A quick sorry seems to suffice on most occasions. So let's all keep calm. No need to rush back to the broken old site just so we can swear till were blue in the face!! Good luck to Mark and Stairs... without them this working, functional site would not have materialised. We are here to moan, celebrate and discuss the efforts of Wednesday. UTO I made a new lucky tit to be going on with. It's a bit small though!! RE: Acceptable Content - Kimmyowl - 09-10-2014 Booo , what's wrong with a bit of eye candy, I've seen young ladies out round sheff wearing less than some of the ladies posted on here. I totally understand the need to moderate things, but the " family" that have stuck together do moderate each other, I must admit I get bored to death on some of the other forums where you can't express your opinions passionately or where sarcasm has become the norm. People rant n rave , it's part of life, but if we are to be controlled in such a manner it's just merely a matter of time before we are calling people bounders and eating prawn Sarnies at matches ...... What what dear sir. This site and the previous one were a breath of fresh air in a world of sites controlled by sponsorships and advertising. Ps ..... Ultra bright makes your teeth clean and white.......... Can be bought at all major stores RE: Acceptable Content - Thurnscoe_OWL - 09-10-2014 (08-10-2014, 01:25)St Charles Owl Wrote:(08-10-2014, 01:19)peiowl Wrote: You mean I can't post some of my 1950s babes? Just seen that this was said. Whilst ever I'm doing the International threads, all images of women that are meant to be in my OP will be removed so the mods have a little less to do ![]() ![]() (09-10-2014, 00:14)Kimmyowl Wrote: Booo , what's wrong with a bit of eye candy, I've seen young ladies out round sheff wearing less than some of the ladies posted on here. You on Owlstalk as well then? ![]() RE: Acceptable Content - Offshore Owl - 09-10-2014 Well bugg-er me, no don't I don't want a cock up my arse, this is getting rather silly. I agree let's block some of the more over the top swearing but what's wrong with the magic arse/tits once a week. If someone is desperate to access porn that can offend they won't be accessing a sports debate site to find it. RE: Acceptable Content - madsteve - 09-10-2014 I can see both sides of the argument here. Love the t*ts & a***s on the match thread. It is mildly amusing, particularly when it coincides with us scoring. I do think some of the foul language is gratuitous & not necessary. It doesn't offend me but I know of three people who left us on the previous site because of the foul language. That bears out what Stairs says that to make this Forum viable, they have to control the language to get more users which in turn attracts sponsors. Football is a passionate game & there are times when you need to explode and "Bloody Hell Old Boy" just won't do. I see far worse (or better) picture wise on Facebook though. RE: Acceptable Content - Southeyowl - 09-10-2014 So we cant post Tits and arse on here!!!!! What a load of gonads! Why don't we just all go back to the other site! That will FECK this site up! Bet the Feckers moaning are Southern Shandy drinking Kants! IMRE don't Go! cos then they win! Stay and piss the Feckers off! (08-10-2014, 00:02)M*rk Wrote: I'd be grateful if you would delete the post above please Imre. you have killed this site Mark RE: Acceptable Content - peiowl - 09-10-2014 (08-10-2014, 20:38)St Charles Owl Wrote: I would just like to add, these changes are not being done just for the fun of it, nor are they being done at the behest of a single person, this really is about the viability of the site in the long run. Stairs and Mark set up this site after the moderator group approached them to look into the possibility of rescuing the old one. This was not possible due to Bonner, so they took it upon themselves to set this up and provide us with a stable platform to continue the "family" we had going. Its fair to say what they have created is better than what we had and I for one am happy they did that. But I can still post my Betty Grable pics can't I? ![]() |