![]() |
deary me - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +----- Forum: Hibernian (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=137) +----- Thread: deary me (/showthread.php?tid=4003) |
RE: deary me - Trusevich - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 17:15)Fredstersafool Wrote: Walter Smith is 100% wrong,Jim you are 100% correct. Please hold me, Jim. ![]() RE: deary me - TheWorthinGer - 13-04-2016 Trusevich Wrote:Fredstersafool Wrote:Walter Smith is 100% wrong,Jim you are 100% correct. Please hold me, Jim. These people just don't get that the SPL and the SFL were two separate organisations and so, after being ousted from the SPL, we had no option but to apply for membership of the SFL...because we weren't already members. You couldn't be a member of both at the same time. Fools, mug and ignoramuses all. Their hatred means that the simplest of concepts passes them by ununderstood. RE: deary me - Paigntonhibby - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 17:31)TheWorthinGer Wrote:please please please worth,rangers were not ousted from anywhere,they went intae administration,liquidation whichever version you prefer, whatever way they had nae money which meant they couldnae remain in the spl according tae the rules. they wirnae thrown out, because o' there financial situation their membership became null and void. they then applied tae join the sfl as a new entity which they were allowed to do in the 3rd division,despite the fact the new entity didnae have 2yrs o' financial reports and the fact there were clubs who had been waiting longer than them tae join the sfl. if anything they were given preferential treatment tae get started again. wouldnt it have been nice if Walter, who i always thought of as a fair and honest man, had come out and said" unfortunately, due to financial mismanagement and some bad decisions by past leaders of the club we ended up where we did, but with good management both on and off the pitch we have slowly got back to where we feel we belong" or something similarTrusevich Wrote:Fredstersafool Wrote:Walter Smith is 100% wrong,Jim you are 100% correct. Please hold me, Jim. RE: deary me - hibeejim21 - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 16:47)Trusevich Wrote: we'll get on with getting back to the top of the Scottish game, and hell mend whoever we trample along the way. It has always been thus,hence why so many other scottish fitba fans enjoyed your demise. You will just have to deal with that. (13-04-2016, 17:15)0762 Wrote:(13-04-2016, 16:05)hibeejim21 Wrote: "There was no necessity for Rangers to be put down into the Third Division and I think that's the thing that will always stay in Scottish football." Smith knows 100% what he was doing. He knows it's all bullshit,he was close enough to proceedings to know where the real fault for the clubs demise lay. ffs he even suggested that financial prudence was not something they should have to adhere to ![]() The kiss off at the end of the interview going on about celtic getting closer to ten in a row was what it was really about. Telling south african dave to get his chequebook out because....walter has spoken. RE: deary me - Trusevich - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 17:54)hibeejim21 Wrote:(13-04-2016, 16:47)Trusevich Wrote: we'll get on with getting back to the top of the Scottish game, and hell mend whoever we trample along the way. We're dealing with it just fine. Dundee Utd destined for obscurity, Hibs destined for another year in obscurity. There's two down just for starters. Hell mend them. RE: deary me - supercooper - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 15:36)Paigntonhibby Wrote:(13-04-2016, 15:27)supercooper Wrote: Hibs fans will be happy in the knowledge that they wont be in the prem next season surely?once again a retort that has nothing whatsoever to do wi' the thread. either agree wi' me or tell me why ye disagree but if ye have tae post on here post something constructive FFS It had everything to do with the thread you were on a bitch fest and i pointed out your hypocrisy. Now had you started a constructive thread then maybe you would have grounds. Now away and fester in your hate. RE: deary me - hibeejim21 - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 17:50)Paigntonhibby Wrote:(13-04-2016, 17:31)TheWorthinGer Wrote:please please please worth,rangers were not ousted from anywhere,they went intae administration,liquidation whichever version you prefer, whatever way they had nae money which meant they couldnae remain in the spl according tae the rules. they wirnae thrown out, because o' there financial situation their membership became null and void. they then applied tae join the sfl as a new entity which they were allowed to do in the 3rd division,despite the fact the new entity didnae have 2yrs o' financial reports and the fact there were clubs who had been waiting longer than them tae join the sfl. if anything they were given preferential treatment tae get started again. wouldnt it have been nice if Walter, who i always thought of as a fair and honest man, had come out and said" unfortunately, due to financial mismanagement and some bad decisions by past leaders of the club we ended up where we did, but with good management both on and off the pitch we have slowly got back to where we feel we belong" or something similarTrusevich Wrote:Fredstersafool Wrote:Walter Smith is 100% wrong,Jim you are 100% correct. Please hold me, Jim. "ousted" from the SPL ![]() ![]() Love it. RE: deary me - Fredstersafool - 13-04-2016 Worthless I'm well aware of the events of TheRangers applications you applied you got knocked back you applied to the SFL and were voted in only because of the financial gain the lower clubs were going to get from your inclusion in there league,simples. RE: deary me - Paigntonhibby - 13-04-2016 (13-04-2016, 18:42)supercooper Wrote:If you don't think the threads on here are up tae your standards o' constructivness, dae one, there's naebody's forcing you tae stay on here(13-04-2016, 15:36)Paigntonhibby Wrote:(13-04-2016, 15:27)supercooper Wrote: Hibs fans will be happy in the knowledge that they wont be in the prem next season surely?once again a retort that has nothing whatsoever to do wi' the thread. either agree wi' me or tell me why ye disagree but if ye have tae post on here post something constructive FFS (13-04-2016, 18:42)supercooper Wrote:If you don't think the threads on here are up tae your standards o' constructivness, dae one, there's naebody's forcing you tae stay on here(13-04-2016, 15:36)Paigntonhibby Wrote:(13-04-2016, 15:27)supercooper Wrote: Hibs fans will be happy in the knowledge that they wont be in the prem next season surely?once again a retort that has nothing whatsoever to do wi' the thread. either agree wi' me or tell me why ye disagree but if ye have tae post on here post something constructive FFS RE: deary me - TheWorthinGer - 13-04-2016 Q.E.D. http://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-07-04/crucial-rangers-vote/ http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-rangers-idUKBRE8630GI20120704 http://www.channel4.com/news/rangers-relegated-to-division-three And Q.E.D. oust aʊst/Submit verb drive out or expel (someone) from a position or place. "the reformists were ousted from power" synonyms: drive out, expel, force out, throw out, remove, remove from office/power, eject, get rid of, depose, topple, unseat, overthrow, bring down, overturn, put out, drum out, thrust out, push out, turn out, purge, evict, dispossess, dismiss, dislodge, displace, supplant, disinherit, show someone the door; More As I said: fools, mugs and ignoramuses. |