04-10-2014, 16:57
One guest just signed up!
|
Liverpool vs WBA - Match Thread
|
Disappointing to concede when we did but we have played well. I would like to see Blanco come on later in the match to provide more creativity and pace.
 Welcome to the forum pipbaggie. We only have 1 rule on this site and it is that you must, at all times, bully and mock BeefyBaggie. He is a masochist so don't worry about hurting his feelings. 
04-10-2014, 17:08
Pinbaggie - excellent welcome aboard. They are all great guys on here and so post and enjoy. #spreadtheword
04-10-2014, 17:15
As I said, 1-0 down is no longer the end of matters - yes!!
04-10-2014, 17:17
(This post was last modified: 04-10-2014, 17:19 by St Charles Owl.)
A deserved equalizer for you guys, but it was never a penalty, definitely outside the box!!!
Didn't take long for the scousers to get back in front though!!
04-10-2014, 17:19
We will take anything. All those years of dodgy results and decisions against us. Bet Merson is hating this. He seems to rate West Brom so low.
04-10-2014, 17:23
Maybe it's OK with the offside law these days, I don't know, but HOW TF isn't Lambert given offside there on that goal? Surely standing a yard in front of the keeper is interfering with play????
04-10-2014, 17:41
(04-10-2014, 17:23)drewks Wrote: Maybe it's OK with the offside law these days, I don't know, but HOW TF isn't Lambert given offside there on that goal? Surely standing a yard in front of the keeper is interfering with play???? You see that every week and they are never given unless that player touches the ball. For me a guy stood in front of the goal in the six yard box has to be deemed to be interfering!! At least had the keeper saved it and it had rebounded to him then I am certain the flag would have gone up, but he is still offside for the initial shot!! |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 1348664730___West_Brom_-_Banner.png]](http://www.footballaid.com/uploads/teams/1348664730___West_Brom_-_Banner.png)