Thread Rating:
James Mclean's Letter To WBA Fans Ahead of Remembrance Day !!
#1
Exclamation 
JAMES MCCLEAN WRITES OPEN LETTER TO WEST BROM FANS TO ONCE AGAIN EXPLAIN ANTI-POPPY STANCE
Chris Wright
20th, October 2015
mcclean-poppies-west-brom

With Remembrance Day coming up in November, West Brom winger James McClean has taken preemptive steps to help diffuse the inevitable controversy that continually surrounds his refusal to wear a poppy stitched onto his shirt.

To the vast majority of Europe, the Poppy stands as a simple symbol of commemoration and appreciation for the men that gave their lives while fighting for their country. However, ask the Catholic/Nationalist population of Northern Ireland what the Poppy symbolises to them, and you’ll probably find you get a rather different answer altogether.

McClean was born and raised in Derry, the scene of the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre – so it’s perfectly understandable that he might not feel like commemorating the British army’s handiwork. Emotions are still very raw in Derry, with most of its population little more than a generation removed from The Troubles.

The winger’s political stance has caused friction before, with his refusal to wear a poppy causing rifts on several previous occasions. He also declined to face the Union Jack or sing the British national anthem on West Brom’s pre-season tour of the United States.

Anyway, with another needless storm on the horizon, McClean wrote an open letter in the official match programme for the Baggies’ game against Sunderland (throughout which he was goaded with chants about the IRA by the away fans) at the weekend, once again clearly outlining and explaining his decision not to wear the poppy emblem:

People say that by not wearing a poppy, I’m being disrespectful but they don’t ask why it is that I choose not to wear it.

If the poppy was simply about World War One and Two victims alone, I would wear it without a problem. I’d wear it every day of the year if that was the thing, but it doesn’t, it stands for all the conflicts that Britain has been involved in.

Because of the history of where I come from in Derry, I cannot wear something that represents that. I have no issue with people that do wear the poppy. I absolutely respect their right to do that but I would hope that people respect my right to have a different opinion on it too.

If I were to sing the British national anthem, that would be disrespectful to the place I come from, to Derry, to my family, because the anthem represents something in recent history that caused a lot of conflict and pain there. A lot of people are still hurting there so I can’t pretend that didn’t happen.

Again, I will stand there in silence while the anthems are played. I will respectfully allow others to sing it. I won’t interfere, but I can’t take part in that.

The people that love the anthem are British, that’s their culture. I totally respect that, that’s great. I wouldn’t ask them to sing the Irish anthem.

My attitude is live and let live, and I don’t think we should have ideas forced on us just as I don’t want to force my ideas on anyone else…I have to stand by my principles.

Perfectly reasonable, you might think. McClean is being intelligent, careful and concise in full knowledge of what’s surely coming in a few weeks’ time.

Let’s see if he manages to get the message across this time, eh?

Incidentally, West Brom boss Tony Pulis referred to McClean as “not the sharpest tool in the box” after he aimed an over-zealous fist pump or two in the direction of the Sunderland fans after Saturday’s 1-0 win at the Hawthorns.
WribbenhallBaggie likes this post
2x Premier League Champ 1x Championship Winner and World cup Winner
Reply
#2
Here we go again.
My view is that he's perfectly entitled to do this - in fact I believe he should be applauded for having strong principles and having the courage to stick with them. In my opinion he's not being confrontational, just honest to his beliefs. Just because these beliefs are different to mine doesn't make me opposed to him, and his right to politely refuse to take part in something he doesn't believe in.
Reply
#3
Agree with you, Drewks, and I also respect MacClean's decision. The only problem I've had is that, when the team lined up for the National Anthem on pre-season tour, he faced the other way. If he could have kept a low profile for 2 minutes, just not singing, it would have gone unnoticed and blown over. Instead it was as if he thought it more important TO BE SEEN shunning the Anthem.
Squirrel Regis and drewks like this post
Start every day off with a smile and get it over with
Reply
#4
(20-10-2015, 16:54)talkSAFT Wrote: Agree with you, Drewks, and I also respect MacClean's decision. The only problem I've had is that, when the team lined up for the National Anthem on pre-season tour, he faced the other way. If he could have kept a low profile for 2 minutes, just not singing, it would have gone unnoticed and blown over. Instead it was as if he thought it more important TO BE SEEN shunning the Anthem.

Fair point talkSAFT  Thumb up
Reply
#5
Yeah, I also think he could have been smarter on the national anthem incident while still not singing it. But he has every right to choose not to wear the poppy, and I support that right fully.
"I would rather spend a holiday in Tuscany than in the Black Country, but if I were compelled to choose between living in West Bromwich or Florence, I should make straight for West Bromwich." - J.B. Priestley
Reply
#6
having read that fair play

i`m irish(as you may know)

i dont ever(and will not) wear a poppy

i pay respects in my own way

and its about time us irish refused to adhere to God Save The Queen as a national anthem


POLITICAL REBELLION i say


Amen To That
@Kristien 1965
Reply
#7
Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
My dad is from Eire and is appalled by Mcleans stance.
I'm a born and bred Englishman and proud to wear a poppy but respect anybody who doesn't including McLean.
Problem for me wasn't McLean not singing the national anthem, why should he he is not British ? But by turning away from the Union Jack he was deliberately disrespecting it and in my opinion should have just bowed his head.
But that's water under the bridge now and I just hope the media doesn't make a big deal out of it.
G-Mac and Brunty are from Northern Ireland but I haven't got a clue what their religious or political beliefs are and don't really care. That's something private for them. Unfortunately McLean is not allowed to keep his beliefs to himself because such a big deal is made of it.
His statement is enough for me I think he should be left alone. Maybe time will heal that rift and from my experience in Belfast most are moving on and trying to put the troubles behind them. Maybe we should all do the same.
drewks likes this post
Reply
#8
One last thought from me: it didn't seem to get a mention anywhere at the time, but immediately after the national anthem fuss blew up, when McClean scored a goal in the subsequent friendly, the first person to go up to him, shake his hand and pat him on the back was Chris Brunt; a gesture which McClean reciprocated immediately. Irrespective of his personal beliefs - which we're all entitled to civilly disagree with if we wish - I'd suggest that the people best placed to judge James McClean as a person are those around him on a daily basis, and none more so than the ones who were also born and raised in Northern Ireland. When push comes to shove, I reckon they can probably tell the difference between a man filled with ideas and a man filled with hate.

Or to put it more concisely: if Chris Brunt doesn't have a problem with James McClean and James McClean doesn't have a problem with Chris Brunt, then I don't see why there's any problem at all. (Aside from him needing to screw his head on a bit tighter and develop the ability to send a cross where it's actually meant to go every now and then. But that's presumably a work in progress.)
drewks likes this post
"I would rather spend a holiday in Tuscany than in the Black Country, but if I were compelled to choose between living in West Bromwich or Florence, I should make straight for West Bromwich." - J.B. Priestley
Reply
#9
(20-10-2015, 23:23)Ska Wrote: ....... if Chris Brunt doesn't have a problem with James McClean and James McClean doesn't have a problem with Chris Brunt, then I don't see why there's any problem at all.  (Aside from him needing to screw his head on a bit tighter and develop the ability to send a cross where it's actually meant to go every now and then.  But that's presumably a work in progress.)

Exactly right; it's the press that are determined to make something of it and WILL do unless something bigger happens on the day to deviate attention. Let's hope that Mourinho admits that he isn't, after all, the best human being that ever lived, or that someone at Chelsea IS at fault for something. That should do it.
Reply
#10
(21-10-2015, 11:42)drewks Wrote:
(20-10-2015, 23:23)Ska Wrote: ....... if Chris Brunt doesn't have a problem with James McClean and James McClean doesn't have a problem with Chris Brunt, then I don't see why there's any problem at all.  (Aside from him needing to screw his head on a bit tighter and develop the ability to send a cross where it's actually meant to go every now and then.  But that's presumably a work in progress.)

Exactly right; it's the press that are determined to make something of it and WILL do unless something bigger happens on the day to deviate attention. Let's hope that Mourinho admits that he isn't, after all, the best human being that ever lived, or that someone at Chelsea IS at fault for something. That should do it.

Bring back Ashley Cole and his rifle!

Take it from a Welshman, you're the only ones who do sing that anthem by the way.

A, she's not our queen, she's "the queen of England".

B, we have our own anthems. I can guarantee you don't sing ours so why should I sing yours?

I've got to be honest I don't even know the words, shocking I know. Laugh

Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)