[Trusevich]

Why are you bringing me into this?

[Paigntonhibby]

nae offence intended trus, fred getting stick for saying exactly the same thing you said a while back, and the guy giving him stick is the one that agreed wi' you. and for what its worth trus i agree wi' yer assessment, he didnae dae a lot against us at the weekend

[Fredstersafool]

Thanks Paington I couldn't mind who had said it.

As for me saying what he was worth Coop you should know by now i'll say loads to annoy the fuq out you.

[Trusevich]

nae offence intended trus, fred getting stick for saying exactly the same thing you said a while back, and the guy giving him stick is the one that agreed wi' you. and for what its worth trus i agree wi' yer assessment, he didnae dae a lot against us at the weekend

Well, I hardly class coops' post as 'agreement'. It was just a conversation.

And, I'll be more than happy to be proved wrong RE: O' Halloran. We'll see how he gets on playing for a big team now.

[El Car]

Like every player he's for sale.

It really is that simple regardless of whatever's said by clubs. He is an important player for SJ and they won't want to lose him but they will have a figure in mind over what they will let him go for.

From what i've seen 500k seems fair. He needs to work on his finishing a bit but he is very quick and skillful. 

If The Rangers can get £200k for a player who played once for them then £500k shoudln't be a problem for O'halloran.

So let's get this right:

- He is for sale.

- All players are for sale.

- They won't state a price.

How can a club be in anyway criticised for making a bid if this is the case?  Since value is subjective, in this situation any bid is a fair bid.

---

If The Rangers can get £200k for a player who played once for them then £500k shoudln't be a problem for O'halloran.

Who has valued him at 500k?

I think that would be a reasonable price for him,however if The Rangers get him for less than that then good stuff.

[Fredstersafool]

Like I say above El Car I love nothing more than noising you lot up especially Pooper.

[supercooper]

I'd be happy not to progress with O'Halloran, to be honest. One good game against us doesn't mean he's good enough to play for us. And I don't think he is.

---

I agree with O'Halloran. He hasn't reached double figures yet, hardly prolific. Has pace but that aint everything. Even if they dont arrive i believe we have more than enough.

these the ones yer thinking o' fred

So you quote a conversation. Not only are you a proven liar, you have the cheek to lecture anyone. And i seen you omitted the simpleton contradicting himself. Absolutely hilarious.

[Paigntonhibby]

nae offence intended trus, fred getting stick for saying exactly the same thing you said a while back, and the guy giving him stick is the one that agreed wi' you. and for what its worth trus i agree wi' yer assessment, he didnae dae a lot against us at the weekend

Well, I hardly class coops' post as 'agreement'. It was just a conversation.

And, I'll be more than happy to be proved wrong RE: O' Halloran. We'll see how he gets on playing for a big team now.

c'mon Trus, he actually said "i agree with o'halloran ".he's quick enough tae have a go at other posters for editing, posting conflicting statements etc. i'm just pointing out he's no' infallible. on your 2nd point  i'm sure o'halloran'll get your full support now he's at your club,efter a', thats what fitba' supporters do.

[supercooper]

Your argument makes no sense. Fred accused me of getting excited about the signing, show me a post where i have said that? Unless saying welcome to the club equates that. Again hilarious at your grasping of straws.

[TheWorthinGer]

I can see this thread being shut until May.