Thread Closed 
Thread Rating:
SPFL2 Tuesday, 01/03/2016 : Rangers v Raith Rovers, KO 19:45 hours.
#41
Trusevich Wrote:As time goes on, it's becoming clear - transparently clear - that the punishments handed out were completely out of scale with what actually went on. The complete over-reaction of senior figures in Scottish football - particularly in claiming that Rangers' actions were akin to match-fixing (a claim that now seems, frankly, obscenely idiotic considering that EBTs are, and always have been an entirely legal framework for entirely legitimate tax avoidance) along with the media shit-storm and the publication of illegally obtained tax documents that ultimately proved nothing - led to the painting of one of the most grossly over-exaggerated pictures of misdeed ever seen.

It's impossible to imagine that the breadth of that Rangers-hating rhetoric didn't influence clubs in their decision to remove Rangers' share in the SPL and give it to Dundee, especially when you consider that some of the main protagonists of that disgraceful rhetoric were senior figures at SPL clubs themselves. That many of them allowed themselves to bow the knee to the demands of the haters in their own supports says it all. Clubs driven by hatred.

Scottish Football - including the vile hatred shown by fans who would rather their own club had died than Rangers not be severely punished - took it's biggest club, it's most successful club, the club with the single largest supporter base and therefore the club that demands the highest value for sponsors and broadcasters - and tried to kill it stone dead.

Pure hatred failed miserably, yet still they see it as the answer. When will they learn?

Jehovah.
#42
What punishments?? how can you punish a new club??

The last court hearing that Hector won would suggest the EBT's are not legal Trus.
#43
EBTs were legal - what is being decided is whether or not Murray International used them correctly.

Why do you insist on making comments and forming opinions grown in the manure of your ignorance?
#44
EBT's were legal?? so are they not now??

Ignorance from me?? yer post suggest you have no idea if they are or not,what is to be Worthless??
#45
(29-02-2016, 14:37)TheWorthinGer Wrote: EBTs were legal - what is being decided is whether or not Murray International used them correctly.

Why do you insist on making comments and forming opinions grown in the manure of your ignorance?

His views and opinions were formed willingly by the rhetoric.
#46
And you know that how??
#47
Because they're too stupid to be anything else.
#48
See Worthless yer stupid.
#49
Do you even know who you're responding to?
#50
Fredstersafool Wrote:EBT's were legal?? so are they not now??

Ignorance from me?? yer post suggest you have no idea if they are or not,what is to be Worthless??

Can you imagine a situation where something that is legal becomes illegal? You know, when something comes to the attention of the parliamentary authorities and they act to either make something completely illegal or tighten the laws to limit the use or availability of something?

Let's face it, most of your opinions are based on the over activity of your imagination so this might not be too much of a leap for you.

Is it not possible for you to realise the difference between validity and legality?  The dispute in question was whether or not the EBTs had been properly constructed and were therefore valid.  Had EBTs been illegal there would have been criminal charges brought relating to tax evasion.

Imagination time again: can you imagine a group of individuals being accused of illegally evading 50+ million in tax and associated penalties not being charged with a criminal offence?

To be called stupid by you is a complement. It's a Freudian thing.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Thread Closed 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)