Well there is Snoots - they and others all invested "heavily" before they went up, many to the point of, if not breaking, severely bending FFP rules and spent more when they got there.
That said we're mostly under no illusion that we are where we are through a tremendous team spirit and a coach who doesn't stick to the same formation every week or even during the game. It took a while to kick into gear with the current squad, Bornmuff found us out home and away and likely they should.
Like last time, we weren't expecting to be in the play-off's, but we are. Like last time, there are teams we'd likely rather play than not, however other teams have a lot more games to play than us, even if some are against each other. They can't both win.
IF, BIG IF, we go up again we're under no illusions about where we'll be. We'll have the lowest budget, by a long chalk, even compared to Burnley, if they stay up. As for spending to stay up there, well here's what spending a fortune to try and stay as the 7th best team in the Prima Donna League gets you, and this doesn't include player wages or all the former managers you might still be paying off. Don't forget, them coming in are supposed (for the most part) to be better than those going out. It might not always be the case.
On the other hand, here's what a yoyo club has spent
Everton and Fulham if you haven't worked it out.
I haven't analysed the Bornmuff's, Villa's and the rest (yet) but don't be too surprised if they are in the same level of transfer spend, even if Villa got a £100m windfall recently. They spent a hefty chunk of that too.
and as you asked - here's Brighton
plus they spent another £12m the year before when they didn't go up, losing to Wendies in the play-off semi-final
The cost of just being mediocre is scandalous in the Prima Donna league.
It also makes you laugh when comments are thrown around about how well some coaches make their teams perform on a "shoe-string" budget. Make that a £60m shoestring and some of them still can't perform.
and Palace have just spent £77 m to stay right where they've been for years
If anyone thinks Deano's "loans" put a dent in our club's finances, they really need to take a good look at the "loans" some other clubs owners have been dishing out.