|
Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC
|
11-03-2016, 20:06
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2016, 20:07 by Imre varadi.)
Not had chance to read it as im working xxxx late thread shit ? so here goes if someones got the same as me then they should be put in the muppet league with you for putting the xxxx thread up at 3 oclock in the xxxx morning ?
1-1 Forest 100 hahah stateside you muppet !! 1-1 lee  
11-03-2016, 21:40
1-2 Hooper
49 D, D, A, H, D
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team....
11-03-2016, 21:57
(11-03-2016, 20:03)themaclad Wrote: If you score first you'll win this, they've got pace up front but apart from that they are a fairly average team We don't start playing until we go 1 down  or sometimes even 2
and complicated
 (11-03-2016, 22:58)Jacko The Flopsy Piglet Wrote: Washington, I think you need to change your score. Don't tell the f'ucking muppets Jacko even if Hollywood never fills it up anyway  BTW are you a painter and decorator from an 80's sit-com    Can't give a 'like' for Petrescu SS he used us to get a work permit complete twat
and complicated
12-03-2016, 11:49
Maddix. No, I'm terrible at decorating but I can recommend someone if you need some doing!
I am, in fact, an erstwhile colleague of Ricky Lenin, legendary star for Felchester Rovers back in the '80s.
You know nothing, Jacko
12-03-2016, 16:04
#SWFC XI v @Official_NFFC: Westwood, Palmer, Lees, Loovens, Pudil, Wallace, Lee, Bannan, McGeady, Forestieri, Hooper. #UTO #WAWAW
The #SWFC bench is as follows: Price, Hunt, Turner, Lopez, Matias, Nuhiu, Joao. #UTO #WAWAW
Illegitimi non carborundum
12-03-2016, 16:10
No Hutch again, and that formation could be 442. 433 or 451!!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
