09-08-2016, 19:30
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2016, 19:38 by hibeejim21.)
They are actually appealing it. There is literally no case,the boy dived and he got away with it. The ref admitted it to rodgers afterwards and apologised. Neilson really has came out with some pish in the aftermath of this game.
"We should have had a dubious penalty after getting a non-existent one in the first half." Just to be consistent you see.
"We develop players - Celtic buy them". Yet celtic had as many homegrown players in their side as they have
"We sign a player on Friday who is ineligible while they sign one on Saturday and he plays"
He seems to struggle with the rules of the game,bit like how he called for tierney to get off the pitch after being halved by cowie when the rules say the player doesn't have to.
I'm starting to see why some jambos want shot of neilson, the guys acting the goat here.
"There's no camera angle that disproves there's contact" said Neilson on STV there, as three different camera angles clearly show it's a dive.
I mean what the xxxx ????
"We should have had a dubious penalty after getting a non-existent one in the first half." Just to be consistent you see.
"We develop players - Celtic buy them". Yet celtic had as many homegrown players in their side as they have
"We sign a player on Friday who is ineligible while they sign one on Saturday and he plays"


I'm starting to see why some jambos want shot of neilson, the guys acting the goat here.
"There's no camera angle that disproves there's contact" said Neilson on STV there, as three different camera angles clearly show it's a dive.

