30-06-2016, 11:50
Hibee your final sentence should be re-written "We expect to sustain this turmoil." Turmoil is a great story and they can profit from it too. Let's go Brand Turmoil!
A week on and FTSE's higher than pre-referendum.
I don't know what will happen except I was alive and sentient before we finally got into the Common Market. Things were fine then. We had fuque-ups and squabbles, made money and lost it too. We'll be fine, or not, as we would have been inside the EU. The future is uncertain as it would have been inside that corrupt bureaucracy. The future is always uncertain - that's why it's the future.
The EU might thrive or not without us, but they are losing one of their very few successful economies. And here's few more observations .....
In the strange world of the Labour Party no one is saying that the leader of the Labour Remain campaign did a crap job. Is it let's kick the crap out of Alan Johnson time?
It is interesting to note that no one in the EU seems to be wondering what is so wrong with that organisation that one of its most significant members has voted to leave. Could that in itself illustrate what is wrong?
Why does no one in Scotland realise that wanting independence and trying to get into the EU are inimical aims? Not only would Scotland be handing over its newly won sovereignty to the EU, but also it could not possibly be a member. All 27 countries have to vote for it. Spain never ever will unless a Catalan Party could win a general election there or find a way to force a referendum. Independence is absolutely viable for Scotland, but its first act shouldn't be to tie itself to a nanny EU.
One of the most likely outcomes of negotiations with the EU is that it won't be us who can't formulate a position but the EU. With 27 members it is very possible that it will be unable to reach and sustain formal negotiating positions as regards the Single Market, the default position will be that we will be outside it, but in a more than sustainable position. Last night when Crispin Blunt MP tried quietly to explain this on Newsnight, Evan Davies ( who I Like!) virtually screamed over him and tried to cross-question him over his opinion of Boris. NOW THAT illustrates why neither side in the campaign itself never managed to say what they may like to have said in a way the people could have understood.
If the Tories want someone who will negotiate in Brussels and won't be fazed by the demands of a tiny country like Luxembourg and the the touchy-feely Mr Juncker they ought to go for Liam Fox as leader. Tories don't have the sense though.
A week on and FTSE's higher than pre-referendum.
I don't know what will happen except I was alive and sentient before we finally got into the Common Market. Things were fine then. We had fuque-ups and squabbles, made money and lost it too. We'll be fine, or not, as we would have been inside the EU. The future is uncertain as it would have been inside that corrupt bureaucracy. The future is always uncertain - that's why it's the future.
The EU might thrive or not without us, but they are losing one of their very few successful economies. And here's few more observations .....
In the strange world of the Labour Party no one is saying that the leader of the Labour Remain campaign did a crap job. Is it let's kick the crap out of Alan Johnson time?
It is interesting to note that no one in the EU seems to be wondering what is so wrong with that organisation that one of its most significant members has voted to leave. Could that in itself illustrate what is wrong?
Why does no one in Scotland realise that wanting independence and trying to get into the EU are inimical aims? Not only would Scotland be handing over its newly won sovereignty to the EU, but also it could not possibly be a member. All 27 countries have to vote for it. Spain never ever will unless a Catalan Party could win a general election there or find a way to force a referendum. Independence is absolutely viable for Scotland, but its first act shouldn't be to tie itself to a nanny EU.
One of the most likely outcomes of negotiations with the EU is that it won't be us who can't formulate a position but the EU. With 27 members it is very possible that it will be unable to reach and sustain formal negotiating positions as regards the Single Market, the default position will be that we will be outside it, but in a more than sustainable position. Last night when Crispin Blunt MP tried quietly to explain this on Newsnight, Evan Davies ( who I Like!) virtually screamed over him and tried to cross-question him over his opinion of Boris. NOW THAT illustrates why neither side in the campaign itself never managed to say what they may like to have said in a way the people could have understood.
If the Tories want someone who will negotiate in Brussels and won't be fazed by the demands of a tiny country like Luxembourg and the the touchy-feely Mr Juncker they ought to go for Liam Fox as leader. Tories don't have the sense though.