19-03-2016, 18:04
(19-03-2016, 18:01)Trusevich Wrote: You're wrong. Rangers never challenged the Herald. They didn't need to. The Herald themselves knew fine well they couldn't back up Spiers' story if - if - Rangers had sued them over it. So they apologised unreservedly. Spiers was sacked by his own deeds after the event. It had f*ck all to do with Rangers or Rangers fans.no' quite there oracle of the north, the legal fees would've crippled the newspaper so under pressure they did what they did. and just as a matter o' interest how did spiers lie
It's about time people like you stopped the black propaganda machine and focused on your own club instead.