29-01-2016, 19:11
(This post was last modified: 29-01-2016, 19:16 by TheWorthinGer.)
(29-01-2016, 17:24)hibeejim21 Wrote:(29-01-2016, 17:21)supercooper Wrote:Is that you finally answering whether you were offended by amaruso's racism now ?(29-01-2016, 13:58)hibeejim21 Wrote: "Is that a direct quote Jim? And can you show where he said that."
Your quite right coops,i'm sure his lawyer just said it in court for a giggle.
So that would be a no then.
Your a day late pal.
(29-01-2016, 16:36)TheWorthinGer Wrote:hibeejim21 Wrote:"He never said that either. His lawyer said the loan was paid back. "
![]()
![]()
There comes a point where you are just arguing for the sake of it ffs. He told the lawyer it had been paid back,it was later found out to be untrue. A lie.
You clearly think he is a solid,upstanding sort. fair enough.
Trusevich Wrote:Yup. Let me - no let us all know the thought processes that lead you to come to any other understanding of what he actually said.
Enlighten us.
Tell you what trus,you show me an example of someone taking a company out of liquidation in the manner king proposed and i'll have a go.
Enlighten me.
Anybody could buy the oldco out of liquidation. At the point were the liquidator declares that they have realised all possible income and distributed to the creditors an offer can be made for the company.
example.
That is nowhere near the same as what king laid out in his "vision" i'm afraid.
This boy isn't trying to put portsmouth FCs assets back into the old company for a start off.
You wouldn't need to. A company doesn't need assets. You said an example I gave you one. Now your not happy because you've been proved wrong - as you usually are.
Too easy.
Here's a wee question - if the lad from Portsmouth had the money could he use his PFC Ltd to buy the club's current holding company and all of its assets?
What's to stop him?