08-01-2016, 01:32
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2016, 01:32 by TheWorthinGer.)
Accrington took a risk signing these lads on short term contracts with no extension clause. Which they could have done.
I would imagine that they signed two young lads, released from a higher league, who were desperate to just have a contract somewhere - regardless of how low the wages. Because all footballers know that once you drop out of the professional game and have to work at something else it's difficult to get back in. They've benefited from having their services at minimal cost for 18 months.
Had they been shite they would have let them go without a whimper.
So long and thanks for all the fish.
I would imagine that they signed two young lads, released from a higher league, who were desperate to just have a contract somewhere - regardless of how low the wages. Because all footballers know that once you drop out of the professional game and have to work at something else it's difficult to get back in. They've benefited from having their services at minimal cost for 18 months.
Had they been shite they would have let them go without a whimper.
So long and thanks for all the fish.