18-12-2015, 21:22
(This post was last modified: 18-12-2015, 21:24 by St Charles Owl.)
(18-12-2015, 21:04)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: Melo is injured, long term knee injury, and Carlos seemed really upset with that. Sasso has been decent when called upon. I'd keep both if we drop off the pace this season
All the others can go
I think Sasso would have played when Lees went down and Hutch filled in but wasn't he still injured as well at that point??
(18-12-2015, 20:18)consilio Wrote:(18-12-2015, 17:10)madsteve Wrote:My point was that if he isn't good enough to get in the side in front of a midfielder at CB then why is he still here.(18-12-2015, 17:00)consilio Wrote: This is the reason a committee doesn't work.
Lachman and Sasso were both signed in the summer and are both CB's. One has not even played a minute of football. Dielna hasn't had a kick either.
If they aren't good enough then why did the committee bring them in?
I don't understand it. It leaves us having to play our best player out of position which affects the team in the midfield. We are paying Hooper 32k a week to have 20 mins off the bench every week. Clearly CC didn't sign Hooper, all that bollocks he spoke about being a long time admirer of his. Makes me laugh!
Didn't Dielna join us last season under SG?
Sasso has played when he has played but he has been injured for the last month or so.
Lachman, Bus, Dielna, Sasso, Melo all need to go ASAP and get them off the wage bill.
We are also paying Jack Hunt around 15k a week. He's no better than Palmer at the moment.
At the end of the day we need cover for every position and as far I know they are our only 2 RBs, so I have no problem with both of them staying as I would imagine they are pushing each other for the starting spot.