[Trusevich]

If it had happened in any other part of the pitch it would also have been given as a foul. The boy touched the ball, yet it ended up going behind him into Law's path, and his trailing leg brought Law down. According to the rules of the game that is deemed a foul.

I'm not even convinced he was trying to win the ball from Law, he wasn't even looking at the ball.

However, Houston (and all the Rangers-haters) only complain about it because Tavernier scored. Well, there were quite a few wrong decisions made against Rangers in that match that we also could have scored from. Nobody gives a f*ck about objectivity or fairness on here though. The hatred of one club dominates.