03-05-2015, 18:02
at least it should have answered the problems that moores should have seen.
cook-fine
trott- not an opener by any stretch of the imagination
ballance- good and dogged
bell- fairweather player really now
root-future of england
ali- thrown back too soon after injury, should never have been considered
stokes- third fourth seamer and counter attacker
buttler- batting too low
jordan- cant be in the same team as stokes
broad- bowling wellish, but might as well bat with a drumstick
anderson- too reliant on him
lyth- moores and cook must still be thinking about him
rashid- not really rated by moores and cook
treds- bowls well, but a containing bowler, cant get a game at kent in div 2 which is problem
wood- again inexperienced and moores and cook dont like that
bairstow- probably wont get many chances
plunkett- cooks ideal bowler so why isnt he playing, probably because of broad
back at home you have woakes who is again a 3rd 4th seamer, robson who got runs yesterday but has major technical flaws amongst others
cook-fine
trott- not an opener by any stretch of the imagination
ballance- good and dogged
bell- fairweather player really now
root-future of england
ali- thrown back too soon after injury, should never have been considered
stokes- third fourth seamer and counter attacker
buttler- batting too low
jordan- cant be in the same team as stokes
broad- bowling wellish, but might as well bat with a drumstick
anderson- too reliant on him
lyth- moores and cook must still be thinking about him
rashid- not really rated by moores and cook
treds- bowls well, but a containing bowler, cant get a game at kent in div 2 which is problem
wood- again inexperienced and moores and cook dont like that
bairstow- probably wont get many chances
plunkett- cooks ideal bowler so why isnt he playing, probably because of broad
back at home you have woakes who is again a 3rd 4th seamer, robson who got runs yesterday but has major technical flaws amongst others