14-09-2014, 15:04
Is a full back made to look poor when he has no 'out ball' when playing the ball from the back. If you're always defending then you're going to give the ball away on occasion. I thought Robinson offered nothing in attack yesterday but is that because he had no-one to pass to moving forward? I also thought he was marking their most skillful player.
Wakey is right, only 3 chances yesterday.
If we'd have snatched a draw it would have been daylight robbery.
Like I said in my earlier post, only my 1st game of the season y'day so hard to be too critical.
I would have put Scannell on for Vaughan. We lacked any pace whatsoever yesterday until Lolley appeared. Scannell could have at least carried the game to them. The introduction of Stead only served for Lynch to punt 40 yard lofted passes. What use is that when he wins no flick ons? Not that there was anyone to collect the knock downs.
Powell set up not to lose, he'd have been better going for it.
Wakey is right, only 3 chances yesterday.
If we'd have snatched a draw it would have been daylight robbery.
Like I said in my earlier post, only my 1st game of the season y'day so hard to be too critical.
I would have put Scannell on for Vaughan. We lacked any pace whatsoever yesterday until Lolley appeared. Scannell could have at least carried the game to them. The introduction of Stead only served for Lynch to punt 40 yard lofted passes. What use is that when he wins no flick ons? Not that there was anyone to collect the knock downs.
Powell set up not to lose, he'd have been better going for it.