Today, 09:03
(This post was last modified: 8 hours ago by Statesideowl.)
FA looking to sanction Ratcliffe after his comments.. They want to impose a ban that will stop him entering his directors box to watch games...
These comments were made outside the sphere of football. Why do the FA feel they have any moral authority?
Are we now finally able to admit that we're living under sharia through the back door? This falls under 'blasphemy'
Ratcliffe didnt even mention muslims, yet they responded as if the shoe fits? Very telling.
How much more evidence do people need? You don't question the narrative, regardless of how wealthy you are.
The guy gave his opinion regarding the current political climate and visible cultural and political shift, outside the sphere of football and 'someone' pressed the FA to lean on him.
We have Gary the tw@ Linekar piping up again making false equivalences that "Ratcliffe is an immigrant in Monaco"
Yes, Ratcliffe is there for tax purposes, he didnt arrive as an undocumented male in a rubber dinghy and start raping or robbing people, for phuks sake, these people are intentionally obfuscating the point.
Every idiot believing they have a moral 'gotcha' are conflating migrants on work visas with undocumented men rocking up on boats.
Again, nuance is lost on those incapable of critical thought. They're only capable of emotional based thinking.
The same people protecting pedos are outraged by someone's opinion and want him to be punished or lose something to cancel culture as a consequence.
Why would that be then? Why isn't anyone allowed to address the elephant in the room without having to fear for their life or livelihood?
Is this the democracy and free speech I hear the cephalopod keep nasally droning about. Filthy rent boy having puppet that he is.
These comments were made outside the sphere of football. Why do the FA feel they have any moral authority?
Are we now finally able to admit that we're living under sharia through the back door? This falls under 'blasphemy'
Ratcliffe didnt even mention muslims, yet they responded as if the shoe fits? Very telling.
How much more evidence do people need? You don't question the narrative, regardless of how wealthy you are.
The guy gave his opinion regarding the current political climate and visible cultural and political shift, outside the sphere of football and 'someone' pressed the FA to lean on him.
We have Gary the tw@ Linekar piping up again making false equivalences that "Ratcliffe is an immigrant in Monaco"
Yes, Ratcliffe is there for tax purposes, he didnt arrive as an undocumented male in a rubber dinghy and start raping or robbing people, for phuks sake, these people are intentionally obfuscating the point.
Every idiot believing they have a moral 'gotcha' are conflating migrants on work visas with undocumented men rocking up on boats.

Again, nuance is lost on those incapable of critical thought. They're only capable of emotional based thinking.
The same people protecting pedos are outraged by someone's opinion and want him to be punished or lose something to cancel culture as a consequence.
Why would that be then? Why isn't anyone allowed to address the elephant in the room without having to fear for their life or livelihood?
Is this the democracy and free speech I hear the cephalopod keep nasally droning about. Filthy rent boy having puppet that he is.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius
