Yesterday, 09:16
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 09:17 by Statesideowl.)
Starmer giving you the middle finger now..
"If you're an asylum-seeker and your need accommodation, you're put in accommodation at the tax payer expense, and their own assets or income are NOT taken into account.
Whereas, if you aren't an asylum-seeker, if you were born here, and you wanted accommodation.
Your assets and your income WILL BE taken in to account... Most people would say that's not fair"
The cephalopod openly admitted it, knowing full well that we can't do phuk all about it.
"If you're an asylum-seeker and your need accommodation, you're put in accommodation at the tax payer expense, and their own assets or income are NOT taken into account.
Whereas, if you aren't an asylum-seeker, if you were born here, and you wanted accommodation.
Your assets and your income WILL BE taken in to account... Most people would say that's not fair"
The cephalopod openly admitted it, knowing full well that we can't do phuk all about it.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius