[4evaabaggie]

I think we should have stuck with Mason..reports on three quarters of our ges says we had a better team  though like the last game 8 shots I goal, whereas the other team 3 shots 2 goals..

So it's the forwards and stupid defending who let him down, thugh his player choice was a bit suspect...

I held this opinion for quite a while, we were frequently the better team in a lot of our games in terms of possession and shots, however the inability to turn possession into shots, shots into shots on target, then turning shots on target into goals. Is a managerial tactic / decision failure.
Whilst at the other end, our substandard goalkeepers lead to lack of confidence in defence, poor decision making and sloppy goals being given away, our inability to defend and defend properly until the final whistle has cost us late late goals and dropped points.
These issues and player selections are the result of poor management and the inability to find a solution is down to Mason. He should have been gone weeks ago in order to give us the best opportunity to get the new man in, in time for him to build a squad to rectify these problems and give us a chance of achieving our end goal …… promotion …….. through whichever route we can.