01-03-2015, 21:42
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2015, 21:45 by Slick_Footwork.)
Interestingly, on the same match of the day, Shearer and co were saying that Vokes should've gone down for
Burnley and that it was a mistake on his part not to go down when fouled.
Yet, on the same show, Sess was labelled a cheat for doing exactly that. Going to ground when pulled.
It's debatable if it's okay or wrong - but the pundits are just as inconsistent as the referees.
Last week for example, the pundits were discussing if Lescott should've been booked or sent off against Sunderland.
IMO, the contact from Lescott wasn't even worthy of a foul - but none of the pundits debated the award. None of
them labelled Graham a cheat when he went over when 'bushed' at most and was waving his imaginary red card.
Was the contact from Lescott a lot heavier than what Sess received from Clyne? IMO, neither contact was heavy
enough to send a football sprawling across the ground - yet in last weeks incident, Graham going to ground was
absolutely fine.
Burnley and that it was a mistake on his part not to go down when fouled.
Yet, on the same show, Sess was labelled a cheat for doing exactly that. Going to ground when pulled.
It's debatable if it's okay or wrong - but the pundits are just as inconsistent as the referees.
Last week for example, the pundits were discussing if Lescott should've been booked or sent off against Sunderland.
IMO, the contact from Lescott wasn't even worthy of a foul - but none of the pundits debated the award. None of
them labelled Graham a cheat when he went over when 'bushed' at most and was waving his imaginary red card.
Was the contact from Lescott a lot heavier than what Sess received from Clyne? IMO, neither contact was heavy
enough to send a football sprawling across the ground - yet in last weeks incident, Graham going to ground was
absolutely fine.