13-04-2025, 16:52
(This post was last modified: 14-04-2025, 08:11 by Statesideowl.)
https://sport.walaw.press/en/article/GMMSMMPPGRRP
The difference between what constitutes 'hate speech' and what doesn't is pretty remarkable. It all comes down to the ethnicity of the person speaking for a start.
This lady might be unpleasant. How is what she said that outrageous? "This isn't immigration, it's an invasion" Thats considered hate speech against Muslims..
This is exactly what I've been talking about. State facilitated subjugation by the Islamic community. The narrative that anyone questioning what is happening must be "far right racist natzee Islamophobes"
Two different individuals, one from the white community and one from the religious or ethnic community can both push hateful rhetoric.
However, only one of them is ever going to be labelled "natzee" or "racist" whilst the behaviour of the other is excused or looked past.
Why is that?
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/government-rev...02430.html
Absolute shiitshow of a country.
Elderly, partially deaf man is warned by Police after telling someone to "speak English"
The elderly man was warned of a potential hate crime...by saying "speak English"
Only a retard could miss this level of subjugation.
Again, Pension Credit is but one benefit in which the religious community are given access to money that nobody else may claim.
Mohammed can claim for multiple Fatima wives. However, for you or I to be in the position to qualify would constitute 'Bigamy' which is illegal to practice in the UK.
So, why are they exempt? why do they have special access to extra money which no other community can claim?
How is this even possible?
When Stalin and Rayner are robbing pensioners and the disabled first. Why isn't the money being taken from Mohammed's second and third wife??
That is why benefits and pensions minister Steve Timms was caught attending a Muslim Council of Great Britain meeting.
Honestly, wake the phuk up. You are being subjugated by a gutter culture and your government is enabling it.
The difference between what constitutes 'hate speech' and what doesn't is pretty remarkable. It all comes down to the ethnicity of the person speaking for a start.
This lady might be unpleasant. How is what she said that outrageous? "This isn't immigration, it's an invasion" Thats considered hate speech against Muslims..
This is exactly what I've been talking about. State facilitated subjugation by the Islamic community. The narrative that anyone questioning what is happening must be "far right racist natzee Islamophobes"

Two different individuals, one from the white community and one from the religious or ethnic community can both push hateful rhetoric.
However, only one of them is ever going to be labelled "natzee" or "racist" whilst the behaviour of the other is excused or looked past.
Why is that?
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/government-rev...02430.html
Absolute shiitshow of a country.
Elderly, partially deaf man is warned by Police after telling someone to "speak English"
The elderly man was warned of a potential hate crime...by saying "speak English"
Only a retard could miss this level of subjugation.
Again, Pension Credit is but one benefit in which the religious community are given access to money that nobody else may claim.
Mohammed can claim for multiple Fatima wives. However, for you or I to be in the position to qualify would constitute 'Bigamy' which is illegal to practice in the UK.
So, why are they exempt? why do they have special access to extra money which no other community can claim?
How is this even possible?
When Stalin and Rayner are robbing pensioners and the disabled first. Why isn't the money being taken from Mohammed's second and third wife??
That is why benefits and pensions minister Steve Timms was caught attending a Muslim Council of Great Britain meeting.
Honestly, wake the phuk up. You are being subjugated by a gutter culture and your government is enabling it.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius