[Statesideowl]

Written in 2005.


"Mr Zander says: "The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 passed in the aftermath of 9/11 set aside habeas corpus in regard to terrorism suspects who cannot be prosecuted. The Prevention of Terrorism Bill now before Parliament would broaden the ways in which terrorism suspects can be dealt with without being charged or prosecuted."

But the Home Office denies its plans amount to habeas corpus suspension. A spokesman said: "We are not removing habeas corpus rights. Everyone has a right to habeas corpus and that will remain the case."

That is exactly what is happening right now. Suspension of habeas corpus for UK natives who are considered problematic by the state, despite the state not applying this same standard to everyone equally it can only be considered suppression.
Worse still, sections of the public applaud this suppression of their opponents whilst claiming they hold the moral high ground lol

State still haven't told us why Rudakubana put on a mask, took a Taxi to a specific location and butchered children. Premeditated attacks like this are usually considered 'Terrorist ' but he was such a sweet boy, here's a picture of him when he was 10 to soften you up.
Why is the state being so deliberately deceitful and shifting focus?

It's a great systematic exercise to create division and distrust and most will give up their freedoms glady for the promise of security.