10-12-2022, 12:51
Thing is, we may not be good at it, but the website is about Chesterfield FC and we are apparently about playing football. If we can't even manage to feature all the players in our own team correctly, it's a poor do, as they say in Yorkshire.
A website should enable users to access basic info' quickly and easily AND give them access to something much more detailed not readily available on social media. We currently don't do particularly well on either count. The snowflakes are a bit annoying too, but it's hard to get angry with something as lovely as a snowflake.
Heavy frost down here in Devon, no snow in Totnes, but I'm there'll be some on Dartmoor.
I don't want to sound like some moaning old grizzled pensioner, which I am. Well not that grizzled! But I just think if you are doing something new, like re-branding a website, you should do it as well as possible. It shouldn't be an it'll-do job. And this still looks old-fashioned to me, although that is also true of most football websites, and all English EFL clubs. The report card will probably read, "COULD DO BETTER", but on the evidence so far I'm not sure we can.
A website should enable users to access basic info' quickly and easily AND give them access to something much more detailed not readily available on social media. We currently don't do particularly well on either count. The snowflakes are a bit annoying too, but it's hard to get angry with something as lovely as a snowflake.
Heavy frost down here in Devon, no snow in Totnes, but I'm there'll be some on Dartmoor.
I don't want to sound like some moaning old grizzled pensioner, which I am. Well not that grizzled! But I just think if you are doing something new, like re-branding a website, you should do it as well as possible. It shouldn't be an it'll-do job. And this still looks old-fashioned to me, although that is also true of most football websites, and all English EFL clubs. The report card will probably read, "COULD DO BETTER", but on the evidence so far I'm not sure we can.