26-04-2022, 14:52
(This post was last modified: 26-04-2022, 14:54 by Slick_Footwork.)
Molumby deal is done according to Bruce.
Presumably the deal was done last year and it was a loan in name only. This seems the only logic considering he's shown very little to justify making his loan permanent if we had any choice in the matter.
I mean he's not even been able to force his way into this extremely average side.
Don't even want to think how much we've had to fork out...
I've not been impressed with him at all. He's another one of these midfielders who might do okay on stats (running, keeping the ball with predominantly safe passes) but does very little in the real game. He can't create, isn't a tackler or enforcer, never looks like he's going to score. The only positive I can say is that he's neat and might do okay if we changed our philosophy to something more possession based. I think he would have to play in a 3 though, alongside a proper defensive midfielder and someone more attack minded. With Bruce headstong on this shoddy back 3, his position doesn't exist.
I'm not sure whose idea it is to keep signing people up long term when the chance is there to have a look at them first. We did the same with Bruce himself.
Just another in a long line of illogical decisions from the powers that be. Hope we've not go the same deal in place for Clarke who IMO is equally average.
Presumably the deal was done last year and it was a loan in name only. This seems the only logic considering he's shown very little to justify making his loan permanent if we had any choice in the matter.
I mean he's not even been able to force his way into this extremely average side.
Don't even want to think how much we've had to fork out...
I've not been impressed with him at all. He's another one of these midfielders who might do okay on stats (running, keeping the ball with predominantly safe passes) but does very little in the real game. He can't create, isn't a tackler or enforcer, never looks like he's going to score. The only positive I can say is that he's neat and might do okay if we changed our philosophy to something more possession based. I think he would have to play in a 3 though, alongside a proper defensive midfielder and someone more attack minded. With Bruce headstong on this shoddy back 3, his position doesn't exist.
I'm not sure whose idea it is to keep signing people up long term when the chance is there to have a look at them first. We did the same with Bruce himself.
Just another in a long line of illogical decisions from the powers that be. Hope we've not go the same deal in place for Clarke who IMO is equally average.