[drewks]

No I wasn't happy with Irvine but what makes anyone think it'll be different with Pulis? Do people actually remember the series of bore fests against Stoke? And as for his time at Palace, yes there were some decent games but on a different site there are some interesting facts about his brief spell -worse possession and successful pass rate than before his arrival and a higher percentage of "long passes" than in his last year's at Stoke. He was also lucky to inherit a squad that enabled Palace to break with pace........So long hoof up to big Vic it is then.

Resorting to 'Cut & Paste' now:
It's been mentioned several times about the brand of football TP got Palace out of trouble with last year, but there are people who just won't take it in - they're so stuck with the 'Stoke Pulis' that they can't see, or admit, the fact that PALACE PLAYED LOVELY FOOTBALL UNDER HIM LAST YEAR!!!!
We haven't got the players to play hooooofball, so if TP comes in do you think JP would sanction getting 4/5 new players in Jan to play this game for TP??
COME ON!!!!!