[St Charles Owl]

The end conclusion is the hope that a people's vote will eventually be called Ritchie - not perfect but it gives the "Brexit movement" a chance to rubber stamp whatever Brexit deal is proposed to be foisted on the country OR it is not endorsed by the people and the status quo prevails! Of course, that will never be the end of it with extremists like Farage preaching his poison but it gives the voting populace the chance to say yay or nay on this issue once and for all after gleaning most of the facts re Brexit and observing the crass behaviour of lotsa political morons in the process.

But even if there was another referendum, and even if it did produce a result that was conclusive, would that be the end of it or would there be a call for more public votes on the topic every few years?? I am sure you know where I am going with this, but the point of a referendum is to produce a result and put the subject to bed, one way of the other. There are many reasons why the first one should not have stood or been acted upon but there are also other referendums that people are clamouring for, what rules should we have on those or will a simple majority again be the deciding decision?