[spireitematt]

I know there are design constraints from the provider chosen by the EFL and that managing the site is mostly merely uploading ..... but that should make it easier to provide good content, not harder. I've never researched who does the National League or whether everyone follows a pattern ....... I'm not that much of a nerd.

Nothing HAS to stay up on a site forever. I agree it does with newspapers ....... and there are some pretty crap local paper sites too. On football sites pretty much unrelated historic crap just floats in after you've finished the thing in which you were interested. Now there must be an edit function which would get rid of this stuff (which must also be clogging the site's capacity) because rules change, laws change, your site could be carrying content which has become illegal or embarrassing .... maybe an ad' for a former sponsor who went bankrupt and ate the neighbours' hamster.

Yeah course you need policy from the top, but I'd also like to see evidence of people at the bottom who are doing their best whatever is happening with DA and AC. Sadly at Chesterfield FC the malaise looks endemic, we're institutionally shite at the moment.

The clubs themselves do there own websites in National League and below.

One website I like is Salford City's because it's straight to the point and accessible and you can find everything really easy. Also I like Leyton Orient's and Salford's Youtube channel for highlights of matches. Compare there Youtube highlights of games to ours and you'll see the difference. Our highlights looks like they've been filmed on a pocket calculator while Salford and Leyton Orient look like they are using a HD resolution camera and Adobe Premiere Pro for graphics.

https://salfordcityfc.co.uk/