Fine by me Pooch.
In the past I've thought we should negotiate a contract which actually specifies what doing the job properly entails. As so much of football is results-based, would it be unreasonable to include a clause that defines failing to do the job satisfactorily as the team appearing in the relegation zone for three successive weeks? If that were an acceptable reason to dispense with a manager's services then this lunatic business of sacking people without good reason and of clubs carrying a string of paid-off defunct managers might become a thing of the past.
At the moment, turning up everyday and putting a shit team on the field every week seems to constitute a manager doing his football job. But if you were a turner and daily you produced product unusable by the factory you'd soon be down the road. Some managers should be sacked and because they have not fulfilled their side of a contract they should not even have a case worth arguing in court.
In the past I've thought we should negotiate a contract which actually specifies what doing the job properly entails. As so much of football is results-based, would it be unreasonable to include a clause that defines failing to do the job satisfactorily as the team appearing in the relegation zone for three successive weeks? If that were an acceptable reason to dispense with a manager's services then this lunatic business of sacking people without good reason and of clubs carrying a string of paid-off defunct managers might become a thing of the past.
At the moment, turning up everyday and putting a shit team on the field every week seems to constitute a manager doing his football job. But if you were a turner and daily you produced product unusable by the factory you'd soon be down the road. Some managers should be sacked and because they have not fulfilled their side of a contract they should not even have a case worth arguing in court.