[Salopbaggie]

Thanks for the explanation Salop.

However, it still doesn't explain the SUSPICION of drink driving. When tested at the roadside he would have been either positive or negative with the same at the follow up test in the nick so how can it be suspicion.

They have to say "suspicion of committing an offence" until the person is actually charged with that offence. They may or may not have the evidence as in the breath or blood test results, but until they actually go through the charge process, the person is still only suspected of carrying out the offence. Sorry I should have explained that a bit clearer.

SEE CJBAGGIES POST BELOW he goes into reasons why the charge may not have been brought yet.

---

Whether that is in the form of a simple speeding offence or a more serious offence of Carless Driving ...  

If Saido can do 110mph without a car I think our problems of pace up front should be a thing of the past...  

Thanks BV I (corrected)