[theo_luddite]

Clever editing by MOTD made it look an even match. The commentator even said the words "wave after wave of Huddersfield attacks" just before half time. They showed two of them.
I thought the penalty was a dive, but having seen the replay, I was wrong. The offside goal though, I can see why the liner gave it. Not because his right foot was offside, but because in real time it looked it. Linesmen don't have split screen timing in their eyeballs. I didn't think Kachunga touched it at the time. I'm sat directly behind Zanka's shot and I thought it went straight in.

It's the liners full time job to spot these things Snoots. The blind mouse on our side of the pitch consistently got it wrong. He didn't know the difference between stood offside when it was kicked and when it was received. If its your full time job and the one you train for week in week out then I would expect both a keen eye and a rudimentary knowledge of the offside law.

If players can be banned retrospectively, why can't goals incorrectly disallowed be chalked back in retrospectively? Can of worms? Absolutely, but every other major sport has an immediate review of these things now, except 18th Century football.