[edgie]

I didn't actually. I said chris sutton was so concerned about celtics attendances that he felt the board should act if they hit the 10k mark. Of course he was just making that up and parkhead had crowds of 40k every week.    What a crock of shit. If you are a season ticket holder you would know full and well the crowds were falling and celtic couldn't be sustained on crowds of 20k. Its you thats making an arse of yourself here bud.

Celtic are not doing anything. Their board tried to impede res12 at every turn,sat back and allowed rangers to phoenix,said nothing about sandy brysons 'evidence' and your biggest shareholder kissed rangers arse as they returned to the league.

They want it all to go away,so they can get back to their cosy little monopoly. And you have the nerve to call other clubs cowards.

GTF.

Jim I don't know you from adam
But I will say I have had a season ticket at park head since I got my first one at hampden, you might have to goggle that.
As to sustaining Celtic you missed the point Celtic don't care if you turn up just that you pay as all business do. They got the cash for the over 40k season books. Just as a point of info Celtics average crowd in the 60s, 70s, and 80s was in the 30k range.

And yes the Celtic board has been resistant, but the fans have moved the agenda and the board have moved with the fans.
As I have said in 3 occasions have Celtic done enough NO, (you ignore that as you do with everything that doesn't suit your agenda), have they done more than the rest YES.

So yes I will call the rest coward and their fans complicit unless you are actually doing something.
You are quite happy to blame Celtic, but what has your club done, not even nothing worse than that Rod told us to move on.

Does Celtic want rangers back of course they do, some Celtic fans also want them back, All Celtic fans want deed co punished and changes at the SFA and I'm sure this will drag on, as Celtic fans are willing to go to court to get that review.