04-09-2017, 18:04
"Because there is zero evidence that is the case"
Asking for a review in the structure of Scottish football is the procedure, hardly zero evidence is it?
We will see what else will happen in time.
And because there is NO support from anyone else what else could Celtic do ?
Go to court to force a review? And risk getting banned from EUFA?
In my opinion Celtic PLC haven't done enough, but they have done something, unlike everyone else which was my point
Or will you deny that too?
As to your claim that Celtic run the SFA/SPL , you cant have it both ways either we run it or we suffered most from it your logic says both ...pick one it cant be both.
There are only two proven conspiracy's in Scottish football and Celtic suffered from both.
"The deila experiment was proving that 100%" did it really ???
average attendances in both his seasons where 43K and 45k
so at least get your facts right. If you are going to talk shite at least get the simple things right, or is that to much to ask
Asking for a review in the structure of Scottish football is the procedure, hardly zero evidence is it?
We will see what else will happen in time.
And because there is NO support from anyone else what else could Celtic do ?
Go to court to force a review? And risk getting banned from EUFA?
In my opinion Celtic PLC haven't done enough, but they have done something, unlike everyone else which was my point
Or will you deny that too?
As to your claim that Celtic run the SFA/SPL , you cant have it both ways either we run it or we suffered most from it your logic says both ...pick one it cant be both.
There are only two proven conspiracy's in Scottish football and Celtic suffered from both.
"The deila experiment was proving that 100%" did it really ???
average attendances in both his seasons where 43K and 45k
so at least get your facts right. If you are going to talk shite at least get the simple things right, or is that to much to ask