28-07-2017, 12:16
(27-07-2017, 10:43)hibeejim21 Wrote: . Topping and McKenzie can witter on about how they were payments to trusts not players,but why did they need side letters idemnifying them against tax liabilities then ?
They cant twatter to their hearts content, the highest court in the land has decided they were wage payments to the players that's why the tax is due.
the legal opinion is based on the 5 way agreement the SPL as was agreed NOT to strip titles.
Part of the official review should be who drafted that and why ......that's the cheating by the athorities bit.