DA is handcuffed to a drowning man.
Surprisingly, not many people are offering to buy a drowning man.
But DA has to sell him as he has invested so much money in the drowning man, but the more he drowns the less attractive he becomes to the market.
And the drowning man knows he is going to drown, because he's handcuffed to a heavy old man who is cussedly refusing either to swim for both of them or set him free.
Does anyone else think the Blades took a look at GC's squad-building and decided they couldn't ruin a promising player like David Brooks by letting us have him?
I do think it'll be a 6 or 7 team battle for who goes down and unless we invest in players we will be one of those involved. The list of shortcomings at the club and on the field is pretty overwhelming. Much as we speculate about the future, AC, GC, or Guy the Pickled Gorilla, the truth is the problem hasn't changed. We are going down for a second time, handcuffed to an old man who won't let us swim.
Surprisingly, not many people are offering to buy a drowning man.
But DA has to sell him as he has invested so much money in the drowning man, but the more he drowns the less attractive he becomes to the market.
And the drowning man knows he is going to drown, because he's handcuffed to a heavy old man who is cussedly refusing either to swim for both of them or set him free.
Does anyone else think the Blades took a look at GC's squad-building and decided they couldn't ruin a promising player like David Brooks by letting us have him?
I do think it'll be a 6 or 7 team battle for who goes down and unless we invest in players we will be one of those involved. The list of shortcomings at the club and on the field is pretty overwhelming. Much as we speculate about the future, AC, GC, or Guy the Pickled Gorilla, the truth is the problem hasn't changed. We are going down for a second time, handcuffed to an old man who won't let us swim.